technology

23242 readers

83 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net

blashork@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

TIL Starlink only exists to create demand for rocket launches (hexbear.net)

submitted 9 months ago by spectre@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On brand, but I guess SpaceX has no path to profitability (go figure), so Starlink has to launch thousands of microsatellites every year cause their orbit is so low that they burn up like right away

I didn't really have high expectations for them of course but they are way below the bar of what even Tesla brings to the table.

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Zoift@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago

SpaceX works because the US is happy to privatize and sell NASA off piecemeal. Its been propped up by federal money since its inception.

[–] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wasting Earth's finite supply of rocket fuel on mindless consumption rather than solving the mysteries of the universe is a special kind of failure on capitalism's part.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago

Not to mention cluttering our orbit with even more useless junk, making it that much harder for actual scientific endeavors to get into space

[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The main practical application I've seen for starlink is to use it to operate cruise missiles/drones in remote parts of the world

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Surely they could do that with satellites that don't immediately burn up?

I only support climate pledge friendly cruise missiles

[–] sharedburdens@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty sure they could, this is just using the toys they have now while they last

[–] voight@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

Starlink being a system of orbital mines meant to create issues for nations with competent space programs