i think the point is that the answer is not reliable. it might be completely correct or borderline wrong, or something in between, and there's no way to tell without verifying everything it says - and then one could look it up oneself in the first place already.
or both, in this case
can they withstand the samash-smash?
true, but i think the comment aims more at "it doesn't have to be this specific con man, they'd fall for other con men too just the same way"
i'm gonna frame this post and send it to my father
or preorder a yacht
was he German? they love going hiking in sandals, and then need to get rescued from mountains.
why does anyone go into the desert with flip flops?
my grandad can stand and talk for hours, that doesn't mean his ramblings would make any sense, or that he could run our country
i think there's a different "sweet spot" for everyone. i agree, doing 3h of productivity in 3h is hard enough, but i wouldn't necessarily need to stretch it over 8h, i'd do fine with 5-6h. my last work hours tend to be the most unproductive ones anyway
i didn't get angry, that was the other guys. just trying to explain it rationally