this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
513 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26516 readers
3120 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago

The one on the left is a MAGA, they're unable to listen to logic even if the answer is right in front of them.

[–] Tixanou@lemm.ee 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I see seven

Are my eyes fucked up

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's obviously nine you pan-arab zionist !

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

People take your joke so personally lol

[–] don@lemm.ee 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I see the problem, the artist forgot the rest of the sentence:

“Four-sided objects, of which there are three.”

Boom. Done. EZPZ. Do better, artist.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Rectangular prisms have 6 sides though.

[–] Allero 3 points 1 hour ago

You discovered "political nuance"

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

I don't know why there's even a debate over that. The answer is clearly "Yanny."

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Instructions unclear, I got my dick caught in the number 8.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

New trolley problem dropped

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I can’t see four. I’m sure it’s there, it just doesn’t appear to me.

[–] Faresh@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 hours ago

I think the joke is that there's indeed unequivocally just three, and that one of them still says four despite that fact, contradicting the readers expectations who normally for this format expects the middle thing to be something that changes with perspective (eg. 6 vs 9)

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 39 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Do you not see four? Your really missing out. I think some guys even started worshiping it. We even started selling a book about four. Once you see it, you can join out super cool club and four based economy.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 15 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] don@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] irreticent@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Shut up, Wesley.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago

We should build a wall around four, and make three pay for for it

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 212 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 14 points 15 hours ago

Goddamn cardies....

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 52 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

At least there are no centrists in here claiming it's 3.5

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago

Or that we should agree on "throur"

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 161 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

What it feels like having a conversation with conservatives

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 38 points 15 hours ago (18 children)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] don@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

Goddammit, Loch Ness Monster, I ain’t gonna give you no tree fiddy

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 74 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This thread is basically what modern politics feels like

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tante_Meier@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

0-based indexing vs. 1-based indexing

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

What? The first ordinal you start counting at doesn't change the total count, and alternatively the last item would be indexed at 2 if you used 0-based indexing.

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 5 points 8 hours ago

1-based indexing vs. 2-based indexing

[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 66 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Is there a way to see this as four? I’m assuming so but legitimately can’t see anything other than three. Is that the joke and I’m overthinking‽ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 189 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

It's a riff on an old meme.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

my favorite thing is when a comic has a very clear message but it's also written at the top what it's about and whay i should take from the message is further explained below.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 93 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

alternative interpretation: it's only possible to be neither right nor wrong on something when the object is physically impossible

[–] imaqtpie@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 7 hours ago

I agree with you on that.

But alternatively: humans can only see a portion of the whole reality of a given situation, and that specific angle can often be misleading.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›