this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
28 points (93.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9523 readers
127 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

paywalled, but slightly interesting just from the highlights. Proposes restriction on building size in zoning laws.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Beryl@jlai.lu 6 points 1 day ago

Highlights

The size of very large houses dramatically increased since 1980, leading to a “McMansion effect.”

Homeowners’ satisfaction drops with nearby McMansions, but not neighborhood satisfaction.

In response to the “McMansion effect”, homeowners enlarge homes and incur more debt.

Isolated McMansions or those built before move-in don’t affect satisfaction or behavior.

Zoning laws limiting maximum house sizes could enhance welfare by reducing pressure to upscale homes.