this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
78 points (80.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7172 readers
240 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/21396569

Moira Donegan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 06.07 EDT

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] penquin@lemm.ee 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

She won't. She never will. That's America's spoiled baby. Both parties are Zionists. haven't you heard her weasely "I'll ensure there is peace and a two states solution" which means "I will absolutely do nothing but send more money weapons to Israel"?

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The "two-state solution" has always been a comprador-negotiated position to establish Bantustans and the Zionists won't even implement that because they are too bust doing land grabs and genocide.

The only liberatory solution is a single state without apartheid.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They've purposefully keep trying to make the two state solution impossible. I hope it bites them one day, making a one-state solution where everyone can live in there peacefully and equally the only option.

[–] TheOubliette@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So long as the resistance fights it is certainly backfiring in that way. Though I forgot to mention that Zionist settlers never really planned to establish two states, they wanted an expansionist status quo and are getting it. But if they ever actually advocated for two states and worked on it, it would be as Bantustans. Zionists could never tolerate Palestinians as equal neighbors on "their" land.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago

They're already openly saying they don't tolerate Lebanese on "their" land

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Reporter: [REDACTED]
Reason: Breaks Community Rules

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

even if she did, which she won't, at this point it's probably too little too late tbh. I hope all the moderate republicans she courted were worth it.

Nah she could still get my vote. It's just that the longer the genocide goes on the higher the price rises. At the start, she could have earned my vote by denouncing Biden and the genocide and demanding an arms embargo to the genocidal ethnostate, then consistently held that position, resigned from the VP position in protest, attempted a citizen's arrest or Genocide Joe, anything. Instead she's steadfastly supported genocide. Now at this point, to earn my vote, she'll have to do all that AND sign legally binding documents promising to invade Israel on day 1 of her presidency to overthrow the genocidal apartheid regime and turn it over to a coalition of all Palestinian resistance groups

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If Kamala wants to be the First Ever FEMALE US President while ALSO Saving us from the Second Coming of Hitler all she has to do is Denounce Genocide?

Well we had a Good Run!

[–] K1nsey6@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah, it's too late for that. She could do a 180 on everything she said she supports but we all know it's election year politics and that none of it is true.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago

What do you mean, I've been enjoying the hell out of my cure for cancer

[–] menemen@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Nah, she also has to promise not to continue enabling this genocide. Obviously an absolute no-go.