foo

joined 1 year ago
[–] foo@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Antidepressants and industrial-strength denial.

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago
[–] foo@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hence the need for pockets

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

No mention of modems at all ... :-(

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you use store-bought bytes or do you prefer to use artisanal bespoke bits?

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Very. Very. Slowly.

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

All things considered, I would too.

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The downsides are having to report Capital Gain, and losing the ability to report Capital Loss.

You just weigh those costs (tax owing for capital gain, or loss of tax credit for capital loss) to see if they are sufficiently offset by the expected returns.

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Please forgive me for doing a straight paste from the Canada Revenue Agency page:

"In kind" contributions:

"You can also make "in kind" contributions (for example, securities you hold in a non-registered account) to your TFSA, as long as the property is a qualified investment.

You will be considered to have disposed of the property at its FMV at the time of the contribution. If the FMV is more than the cost of the property, you will have to report the capital gain on your income tax and benefit return. However, if the cost of the property is more than its FMV, you cannot claim the resulting capital loss. The amount of the contribution to your TFSA will be equal to the FMV of the property."

[–] foo@lemmy.ca 66 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US

view more: ‹ prev next ›