Valthorn

joined 1 year ago
[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 140 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Rock and stone, brother!

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 12 points 2 weeks ago

Sloppy joe from Wish

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 18 points 1 month ago

That would be socialism, and the Moderates can't have that, can they?

Jokes aside, more probably the Sweden Democrats demanded this in exhange for something else.

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is a preposterous claim, not believable at all! You mean to tell me that Bill Gates' 5G nanobots play no role in this?

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 124 points 1 month ago

No you're not.

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 7 points 1 month ago

Can't be. The cat sits quietly, but Morn couldn't shut up for his life. Endless talking!

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 50 points 1 month ago

I believe this is the woman in her 30's being referred to in the title.

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why can't we ever get rid of fascists?

I believe this is where the second amendment comes in.

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Anti-trans works as an adjective in this sentence, so it is a ban that is anti-trans in nature, not a ban of anti-trans behaviour.

Your commiting a logical falacy believing that a double negative automatically means the same as no negative. "You are not allowed to not run" doesn't mean that you are merely allowed to run, it means you must run.

Buuut again, I assume your logic means the downvotes to your comment acts like a negation to your comment and so I'm not sure what you meant.

[–] Valthorn@feddit.nu 1 points 3 months ago

It's a pretty standard way to write 60 votes for to 31 votes against, but again, since your comment has negative votes means you actually understood that. Negations, man. How do they work?

view more: next ›