this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
133 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

28122 readers
245 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fact is, the Lemmy ecosystem needs money to handle the growing server reqirements as more people migrate as well as the development cost of new features (I know Lemmy is OSS but the devs should still get some compensation for their effort).

Seeing how much some reddit users love awards so much that they cant stop giving money to Reddit to award posts protesting the api change, this could be a great way for users to voluntary support the ecosystem. It can be easily ignored by users not caring about them (clients could even add an option to hide them), but users liking the feature can go wild and this time the money goes to volunteers keeping this alive instead of greedy admins, power mods and investors.

Though there would be some big organization questions attached: attached:

  • Which server handles the payment? A centralized one, the one where the post was made or the one where the user giving the award account was created.
  • How will the money be shared between the Devs and the individual instances in a way that is fair but cant be abused easily.
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’d love to see an awards system! It’d be great to select the instance that receives the funds with the default being where their account is registered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't love the awards from Reddit, but I would like to see something like this (unpopular opinion, I know). Instances need funding.

I don't care about what the awards are themselves, I care about the way the funding works. I would love to see the funds split in a two tiered system.

Here is a general example of my idea. When a award is purchased it gets split into two pots. One pot is a general pot that gets disbursed to those running the instances based on whatever metrics and intervals agreed upon. The other part gets assigned to the reward itself. So in this example let's say an award costs one dollar. 90 cents would go to the pool to be split, the other 10 cents would be tied to the award. So if you award a post on an instance it goes specifically to that instance itself. Instances could even set a percent split with community moderators of the 10 cents. That way you could fund moderators (if that ever becomes needed)

You could even split part of the award reward with the commentor assigned to it... but that puts a weird feeling in my gut and I feel like it is a bad idea to monetize the content itself.

There is a lot you could do with this and a lot more would need to be fleshed out, so I am just thinking out loud.

[–] hitagi@ani.social 5 points 1 year ago

THANKS FOR THE GOLD KIND STRANGER.

I think it's interesting to look into but it might be abusable. The payment system will be so complicated on top of the legal issues that one would need to deal with.

Upvotes are fine for now.

[–] toasteranimation@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

Forget useless awards, we need c̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶c̶u̶r̶r̶e̶n̶c̶y̶ tipping abilities baked in here.

Edit: never mind

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

crypto is the beanie babies for this generation. Some people are going to make a lot of money but a vast, vast majority are going to be the proud owners of something worthless that they spent a lot of money on.

[–] toasteranimation@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

OK, thanks

You don’t have to put your life savings in, just use it to send 5 bucks across the network the same way you use Venmo

[–] effingjoe@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To what end? So it can get converted into a real currency immediately? I understand (since you spammed it everywhere) that you can donate via crypto, but that's only because crypto can be converted into a real currency.

Give it up, my friend; fetch isn't going to happen.

[–] toasteranimation@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

this comment is fetch.

Ok I give up crypto is the worst thing ever

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please, let’s not. Social media is best without any monetary incentives. If you want monetary compensation for your shit posts you can set up a Patreon or whatever blockchain equivalent you prefer. No need to embed it directly into the platform.

Regarding cryptocurrency, it’s negatively viewed upon because it’s heavily infested with scams. There’s no trust in it anymore. Quite poetic, because “trustless” is one of its main buzzwords.

[–] toasteranimation@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m taking about creators like people who might use lemmy as their primary place to display the fruits of their efforts, be they photographers, artists, programmers, NSFW models, the list is endless. Integration of cryptocurrencies to pay people flies in the face of what these people currently must do, which is go to YouTube or onlyfans to profit, leaving these companies to take more than their fair share. Giving a way to pay people right here would grow the community and decrease reliance on these third party companies that indirectly pay people off the views they generate through ads.

It’s just obvious, and whether or not people like it, crypto payments will get integrated in the l̶e̶m̶m̶y̶v̶e̶r̶s̶e̶ fediverse in time

[–] Niello@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just being decentralised doesn't mean they have anything else in common.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Aradina@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not opposed to ways for people paying out of their own pocket to host to get some funds to help cover that, but I worry it'll never be well implemented.

I think a good first step would be a default and built in way for server admins to add a small donations banner listing the hosting costs of their instances. That also does have issues though, of course. The person hosting is definitely putting in the most money, but other moderators and admins are contributing labour too.

It's a tough subject, and many solutions would be rife with abuse. Shit sucks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I think donations by themselves are fine. They don't need to have fancy stuff attached to them.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Replace "rewards" with "emoji reacts" and "needs money to handle growing server requirements" with "appreciates your donations to help cover hosting costs" and I think you may be on to something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ttmrichter@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think making likes and dislikes public is bad enough. You can probably guess how that applies to "gold".

[–] garyyo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think the idea is fine but the label of "awards" kinda sucks. Reddit often had them misused (e.g. giving wholesome on non wholesome posts). I like how discord frames it's super reactions and think it would be a better system. Only the name, the way they should act should be largely the same, I don't want animated reactions like discord does.

I'll only feel good about awards if they're shitty

[–] Ignacio@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (35 children)
[–] DarkenLM@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The KBin awards are akin to Stack Overflow's award system, which I don't mind, it's a small fun system on the side. Reddit's award system, on the other hand, can go back to the hell pit whence it came.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On a serious note, I think the best implementation would be like a "trophy case"(like reddit) , where each instance can give any user an award for any reason that they can display in their user page. Doesn't get in the way of discussion, but gives you a sense of pride and accomplishment. (heh)

Unlike reddit, these award should be able to be turned off individually , since you don't want rogue instance admins to give you offensive "awards" for your user page.

You also shouldn't be able to see awards from defederated instances to prevent trolling.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hadn't thought of this trophy case idea. I like it. I still don't want awards that are in any way desirable. Like, I don't know I was reading Calvin and Hobbes this morning maybe a "noodle incident" type award. If you have a memorable post like the not pooping dude maybe an admin or mod puts that in your trophy case? I don't completely wake up for another hour but I like this train of thought you've put me on

Edit: starting to wake up something about beans

[–] NENathaniel@lemmy.film 3 points 1 year ago

I’d like the idea if they either can’t be purchased, or the purchase goes toward your Instance’s hosting fees

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›