this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
217 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3860 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick had a few choice words for the public on his way out the door of the Pentagon's All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office

Sean Kirkpatrick was once the man in charge of a D.C.-backed agency tasked with investigating claims into unidentified anomalous phenomena, the new term for what most people still call UFOs. He stepped down from the position in December, and has now published a excoriating farewell letter in Scientific American detailing some of the reasons why.

So why did he stop hunting for UFOs on behalf of the American government? In short: Because congressional leaders believe in conspiracy theories with absolutely no substantial proof. “Our efforts were ultimately overwhelmed by sensational but unsupported claims that ignored contradictory evidence yet captured the attention of policy makers and the public, driving legislative battles and dominating the public narrative,” Kirkpatrick said in Scientific American.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Here's the link to the actual letter, for any one curious

it's worth a read. Though, ask yourself... given the capability of interstellar travel, and knowing humans had the psychotic tendency to nuke themselves... multiple times... Would you visit here on vacation?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I just want to know what the lights on all those UFOs people see are for. Too dark in space?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Aliens obey FAA regulations regarding navigation lights.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

navigation/position markers on helicopters, or some kind of sUAS, probably. If it's dark enough, you won't see the aircraft itself, especially at a distance, unless it occludes something lit behind it, and helicopters can move in ways you wouldn't necessarily expect. (for example, these are full-collective RC helicopters. The only reasons we don't see full sized birds doing that are the power to weight ratio, human limitations and... the unfortunately boring question of "why")

edit to add: here's the Wildcats demo team, they're a UK based acrobatics team flying. The tictocs, inverted flying, etc, are things you see in rc heli 3d flying; a consequence of the ridiculous power to weight ratio and being able to adjust the throw on the swashplate so that the blades can go "negative pitch" (relative to the aircraft, the rotors would be pushing down instead of up. there's no reason to do that on a full scale bird; besides making passengers vomit. Which is easy enough to do anyhow. Wildcats love taking fighter pilots up...)

ETA2: the UK Chinook demo team, too

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I don't think you realize how big space is.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Space is big. I mean, really really big. You may think it's a long walk down the street to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I do, actually. I'm just ignoring that discussion because it usually gets eyes to gloss over. (edit, and there's a lot of handwavium that even JJ Abrams could be proud of there.)

So I'm going with the "would you want to visit a psychotic species that has nuked itself hundreds of times?" (only 2 were done in anger, but there were more than 500 atmospheric tests. Thousands of underground/sea tests, as well.)

Also, for clarification, I'm saying they're seeing human-made aircraft, either helicopters or sUAS's performing in ways that people who aren't quite as familiar wouldn't expect. if you can't see the aircraft body and just guess off navigation markers, you can wind up with some rather wild assumptions.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

That’s a relative statement.

[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And you're a relative badger.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

That’s Honey Badger to you.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is one of the only cases where discussing size is not relative actually. Space is always big. It's big compared to a person, it's big compared to a planet, it's big compared to a star system, it's big compared to a galaxy, it's big compared to a galactic cluster, and it's approximately equal in size to the universe.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

My comment was a humorous play on words, especially if understood in the context of physics and the theory of relativity, which deals with the fabric of space and time. In this context, I’m making a joke about the concept of “big” being relative in the vast and complex expanse of the universe.

[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's like a spastic dragon fly.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

TBH as an RC heli pilot I am no where near that skilled. I can manage to not crash and maybe get inverted a bit and do some funnels, maybe a few ticktocks by accident (where the rotor goes mostly on edge and pounces between slightly not-inverted and slightly inverted)

these guys are phenomenal.

Mostly, I like building whacky things, or like, scale models of sci-fi ships, and doing my best to hide the rotors and stuff. one of my favorites is Klatu's ship from the 1950's version of the Day the Earth Stood Still. I may have fucked around with a cop that was "Catching up on his reports" (aka napping).

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, humans would do it. We would hold Running Man contests on pay-per-view to help pay for it. The contestants would literally kill each other for the ability to take an interstellar flight to a planet with deadly alien life. Just for the chance see and probably be killed by an alien.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 9 months ago

That or just Wildlife videos.

"So begins the mating dance of the dominant species on this planet, a mostly hairless ape that is nearly sapient, capable of great feats of intuitive engineering but shockingly lacking in yfgiiizghi thought processes. Their unfortunate lack of competition has already created a devastating ecological catastrophe that shall yet grow worse, but that matters not to Brad, who appears to be exaggerating the size of a fish he caught to Becky."

[–] Headofthebored@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I think we humans are probably a bit self-centered or narcissistic in our fascination with aliens, like the belief they may wish to control or take our planet, or something. Objects in space are all pretty much made out of the same elements, so we probably have nothing they would need if they have technology that makes traveling to us trivial. Space is so vast it would be easier for them at that technology level to obtain whatever they need from uninhabited planets or asteroids and avoid any unnecessary hassle or contamination. I've often felt that if we've actually been noticed by any alien presence, we're probably regarded much the same way an anthill at the edge of a truck stop parking lot is, rarely acknowledged, much less cared about when we are.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Except for the entomologist-types that are into that sort of thing, or we piss off the wrong proverbial trucker and they pour out a proverbial gallon of gas and set the anthill on fire, sure.

The entomologist types would be careful enough to not give us anything crazy… unless they’re polish. At which point, they might just let the proverbial cannibal ants out. (Seriously, did they not realize cannibal ants in an abandoned Soviet nuclear bunker is how the world ends? They need to watch more b-rated sci-fi…)

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 0 points 9 months ago

Guy who didn't want the job whines about the job in public after refusing to do it

[–] sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago

I don't know man, sounds like something an alien would say

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Shout-out to the All Domain Research Office's reporting website, that requires being a federal employee and submitting unclassified proof.

Nothing worth knowing will be unclassified, that's his basis for "nobody submitted any proof"

https://www.aaro.mil/AARO-Reporting-Information/

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

Submitting classified information would be illegal. How in the world could they require anything else?

[–] HM05_Me@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Also, AARO didn’t even have a website until August 31 2023. Sean Kirkpatrick admitted to speaking with people like David Grusch prior to officially starting his role. But, since these didn’t go through official reporting channels they never got reviewed. DOD even released a report admitting to failing at documenting UAP.

[–] magnusrufus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Was that the only way to reach out or submit proof?

[–] Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's the only one I could find.

[–] HollandJim@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

And as expected the conversation shifts from the facts gathered by the article to every other kind of speculation possible. Didn’t even have time to make popcorn.

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All these sweaties have no imagination.

I dont need faster than light travel, I just have to have developed earlier than you.

You know what a Von Newman probe is? Its a machine that is capable of self replication.

So lets say that thousands of years ago an alien species identifies solar systems with planets inside their habitable zones and launches Von Newman probes at them - no faster than light travel required.

Also explains crashes, the mini-probes, built by the "mothership" are literally that - expendable.

We are literally talking about doing something similar to Alpha Centurai

https://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-selects-a-wild-plan-to-swarm-proxima-centauri-with-thousands-of-tiny-probes

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You know what a Von Newman probe is?

No, please do tell us what a Von "Newman" probe is.