I propose a new, more threatening kind of control flow.
do {
/* something */
} or else {
/* you don't want to find out */
}
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024
763 points (98.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
19386 readers
94 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Some C++ style guides suggest the following naming convention for functions that crash on any error
OpenFileOrDie()
PHP has the always wonderful (and perfectly functional) syntax of
logUserIn() or die();
load more comments
(4 replies)
Personally, I like to call catched exception variables up, so for a rethrow I can throw up;.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
this is just a menacing try/catch!
It_would_be_a_shame_if(condition)
load more comments
(5 replies)
Please God let this be a humorous post that somehow does not also find a way to manage to come true...
I would have bought it if they said ifnot instead, it's the same number of characters and wouldn't require a major parser overhaul to support keywords with a ' in the name.
i mean, “unless” tends to be the usual term for an “if not” keyword in languages that implement such a thing
load more comments
(2 replies)
cap () {
}
nocap () {
}
nocap(frfr){
}
Reduce exclamation marks!? Great Scott!!!!! Is there a shortage of punctuation in the future!?
You could have saved two, all you had to do was use the interrobang. You’re a monster.
All known deposits were depleted
1.21GB!!!
load more comments
(1 replies)
ifn't(!valid) halp?
I believe that resolves the same as
ain't!(!untrue)
Why not just ifnot? Same count of characters but an o instead of a possibly problematic single quote.
I think it's just capitalizing on a trend to add n't to otherwise noy contractions, to make them into contractions. Contractionn'ts, if you will
Yes... how is "reducing exclamation marks" a good thing when you do it by adding a ' (not to be confused with , ´,‘or’` ..which are all different characters).
Does this rely on the assumption that everyone uses a US QWERTY keyboard where ! happens to be slightly more inconvenient than typing '?
If someone really wanted to add it, probably the best would be to use unless
load more comments
(2 replies)
Still not as good as whence
Is this a reference to something because I’d love to read it if you have a time to share.
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Help's with readability"? You know what else helps? Not using contractions and introducing an unbalanced single quote.
load more comments
(2 replies)
I'm struggling to understand if this is true or ifn't true
Imagine the regex needed to highlight code with that extra single quote.
I'm just hoping this paves the way to code with Southern dialect
iffun is == true
iffun ain't == false
May I introduce you to the joys of #define and creating your own horrible sub language
load more comments
(1 replies)
With ahit like that its not microsoft java its now microsoft javascript
load more comments
(1 replies)
reminds me of #ifndef instead of #if !defined(...)
This can't be for real. I'll stick with C11 thank you.
Here you dropped this:
#define ifnt(x) if (!(x))
This has to be illegal. I mean, it's basically suicide incitement (or whatever is the phrase for it)
view more: next ›