this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2023
45 points (90.9% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3625 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
45
GOP Tactician Shares 'Star Wars' Strategy To Take Down Trump (www.huffpost.com)
submitted 1 year ago by USAONE@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] neptune@dmv.social 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In “Star Wars,” he said, “we learn that Luke Skywalker eventually had to confront Darth Vader.”

“He couldn’t sit back and just wait for the Force or Han Solo to take care of it for him,” Heye added. “So, Ron DeSantis, a Tim Scott, a Mike Pence, if they want to win the nomination, goes through Donald Trump and you have to confront him. You can’t hope that somebody else will do it for you. Hope is never a political strategy.”

This is a really weird analogy. If you watch ESB Luke decided to confront Vader largely because Han was a hostage. As for the force, who isn't a character, the old guard (Yoda and Ben) didn't want Luke to confront Vader. OK, maybe not the worst analogy after all.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

And essentially nothing happened to Vader, while Luke ended up in the diaper tank.

The message isn't wrong, if any other Republican wants the 2024 nomination, Trump has to either be out of the running, or lose to them.

For Trump to be out of the running, he has to either:

  • Finally have the party wake up to his actual criminality and horribleness and turn away from him, or
  • Drop out of the race on his own, or
  • Die.

For Trump to remain in the running, but lose, he has to:

  • Finally have the party wake up to his actual criminality and horribleness and turn away from him.

Right now, in this moment, the party is firmly behind him, even if a good portion of high-ranking Republican politicians are not. In order for the party to turn away from him, there has to come a tipping point. Something has to happen, or come to light, that causes people to change their minds. Considering all the things Trump has done, and that his popularity has only grown, I cannot fathom what such a thing could possibly be.

Honestly, the far and away most likely way for Trump to not get the 2024 nomination is for him to die.

[–] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he's referring to RotJ.

Still not a perfect analogy, but it's the RotJ plot where he knows who Vader is now, and doesn't want to confront and kill his own father, but that's what he has to do.

[–] neptune@dmv.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah good point.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Having not read the article: So is he supposed to be Palatine? Then what, pence, his second in command would be Vader, who did turn to the light side and get Biden (correctly) in by not destroying him? ... So now, are we waiting for uh... Biden's nephew/niece to turn Republican, and a secret trump grandkid to turn them back and restoring balance?

Does that make most of Congress Jarjar?

This is definitely not podracing.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does that make most of Congress Jarjar?

Are we talking the jarjar that's actually incompetent, Or the Jarjar theory that he was actually a very powerful sith that was able to act like a goofball to be put into positions of power?

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was talking about the incompetent one, but we do have two halves of Congress, and one is definitely incompetent, the other manages to impede progress

Nah, incompetent, and theories of who puppets who.

... Does this make the supreme Court the hutts?

[–] Froyn@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I would not put a case regarding slavery in front of them.

[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I just want to knownhow Ewoks fit into this.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Might have been nice if the republican traitor filth hadn’t created this monster in the first place.

[–] mrbonejangles@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t deserve to be President if your scared of taking on this bloated verbal fart generator

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 2 points 1 year ago

He and his followers are dangerous. I'd say fear is warranted.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Turn off your targeting computer and shoot a missile up his arse?

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

There can only be 2, a master and apprentice?

[–] Papercrane@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The mounting indictments against Trump have only “bizarrely” reinforced among Republicans the former president’s false messages that “the system is rigged” and “there’s a two-tier system of justice,” veteran strategist Heye said

But that's not really a false message, is it? Because clearly the system is rigged

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

This shows the two tier system of justice, just not how they think. Rich people vs everyone else. The kid gloves used here are covered in bubble wrap.