this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
82 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3804 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I hate how the media treats the social security trust fund as some sort of autonomous entity that can go broke. It’s a government program. If what comes out of our paychecks doesn’t fully fund it, allocate money from the general fund or just get rid of the cap so high income people pay the same rate as everybody else. It might be the easiest problem to solve that we’re avoiding solving.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The trust fund is going broke because Congress looted it to pay other programs, and now doesn't want to pay the money back.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

They robbed us while giving tax cuts to the rich and wealthy. Then they gave billions of dollars of contracts to them.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

And it will clearly be solved, but probably not until the last possible minute like always. None of the parties can afford to lose voters on social security.

[–] dwemthy@lemdro.id 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The cap is insane, had no idea about it until I was fortunate enough to hit it and I had to ask HR if there was an error. It's a blatant giveaway to high earners

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 1 points 2 hours ago

It is completely insane and regressive. Poor people who need the money to live should be spared the tax, and rich people who aren't going to miss it should pay.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

They need a fire burning to point at and say that it's coming for you.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Name a single good thing and Trump will make it worse.

His supporters are the ones who will most be hurt by his policies.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Don't you think he looks tired.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

By having the Midas Shit Touch?

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 12 hours ago

Axios - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Axios:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.axios.com/2024/10/21/donald-trump-social-security-outlook?utm=axios_app
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support