this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
106 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3686 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Section I summarizes the evidence showing that the Proud Boys specifically planned to “storm the Capitol” on January 6th. Even though the group’s leaders and members tried to cover their tracks after the attack, they left a trail of incriminating evidence. Therefore, the summary in these first three sections is based largely on the Proud Boys’ own words, including signed admissions of guilt.

Section II includes an analysis of the charges against 100 Proud Boy members, leaders, and their associates. This analysis shows that more than 70 percent of these January 6th defendants have been charged with one or more felonies, and more than half of them have already been convicted.

Section III presents a map of the hometowns for each of these 100 January 6th defendants. The map is not just for show – it underscores a key analytic point: The Proud Boys relied on personnel from around the country on January 6th. These defendants included not only members of the group, but also the leadership of various Proud Boy chapters. This analysis demonstrates the Proud Boys utilized a national network, with a hierarchical chain-of-command, to execute the attack on the Capitol.

Finally, this analysis is not just backward looking. Section IV briefly assesses the future of the Proud Boys. Despite the post-January 6th arrests and convictions, the group has survived — and evolved. Though it is widely assumed that the Proud Boys lack a coherent national leadership today, law enforcement agencies should not underestimate the group’s capabilities. It is possible that new leaders have already emerged to succeed their imprisoned comrades. It is also possible that the Proud Boys’ January 6th leadership will receive a presidential pardon, allowing them to return to the fold as heroes. In that event, they would inherit a national network of Proud Boy chapters – not all that dissimilar from the organization that existed on January 6, 2021.

Archived at https://ghostarchive.org/archive/BXrUR

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cymbal_king@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

While important info, it's a long read that doesn't really provide much new information about "future scenarios" to be aware of.