this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

news

23488 readers
683 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The probe covers 2016-2024 Model S and X vehicles with the optional system as well as 2017-2024 Model 3, 2020-2024 Model Y, and 2023-2024 Cybertruck vehicles.

Tesla's "camera-only" approach to partially and fully autonomous driving systems, some industry experts have said, could cause issues in low-visibility conditions as the vehicles do not have a set of back-up sensors.

"Weather conditions can impact the camera's ability to see things and I think the regulatory environment will certainly weigh in on this," said Jeff Schuster, vice president at GlobalData.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CantaloupeAss@hexbear.net 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's crazy to me how long public crimes can go on before any kind of regulatory authority does anything. We've been reading about self-driving cars going haywire and killing people for years.

Feels akin to Eric Adams being indicted, when there were reports of his shady dealings with Turkey for a long time. Like, what the fuck took so long? Why can I read about a crime in the newspaper years before the person is investigated?

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The complete unwillingness of anyone in the American “justice” system to do their fucking jobs is wild to me.

Like, if nothing else, being the one guy willing to go after a big fish will catapult you into a media career if you want it.

Why isn’t there one random rogue mayor or sheriff willing to take a big gamble and arrest someone powerful for blatantly breaking the law if for no other reason than clout? Why did no one arrest Trump for violating their mask mandates back when those existed? Why hasn’t anyone arrested Biden for violating US law by giving weapons to Israel? Or Nancy Pelosi for insider trading?

Like, will it work in the end? Probably not but fuck it, why not try? There’s nothing legally preventing it, technically high ranking politicians are no different from anyone else and if they commit a crime in your jurisdiction you have just as much right as with anyone else to drag them out in handcuffs, book them, and throw them in a cell awaiting trial. In fact, wealthy powerful people are a huge flight risk, you should probably deny them bail.

[–] Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

People who investigate rich people very quickly find out why it doesn't happen often. And those who don't get the message... don't investigate for much longer.

Comrade, have you forgotten that the term 'dictatorship of the bourgeoisie' is very literal

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Sure, but I really struggle to think that of the over 3000 sheriffs and however many mayors in this country none have tried. These are not all people with a rational way of calculating personal risk. Sheriffs and mayors are largely “The most insane weirdo you could find in the county/city.” Like, the currently sitting sheriff in my hometown killed a pedestrian drunk driving and is it’s widely known he continues to drive drunk. He clearly doesn’t think that much of his own safety, is it that big of a stretch for him to decide to save America from the evil Joe Brandon just by doing his job?

Like, do you think Joe Arpaio is out here like “Man I would love to arrest Joe Biden, but due to the risk I perceive to my own safety, I’ll have to let him go”?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

We've been reading about self-driving cars going haywire and killing people for years.

Computer touchers still insist that the bazingamobiles are "safer drivers than the human" smuglord (that's the way they put it, creeps).

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One of the most bazinga takes I've ever heard about bazingamobiles was that every fatality in one was good because it would "help train the AI."

I heard that claim before the LLM treat printer thing really took off, so it was another kind of computer touching faith to a death cult that required human sacrifice.

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 6 points 3 days ago

Decapitating the car’s occupants is like when genAI was making extra fingers, you just write better code to correct it

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Tesla's "camera-only" approach to partially and fully autonomous driving systems, some industry experts have said, could cause issues in low-visibility conditions as the vehicles do not have a set of back-up sensors.

No back-up sensors? No problem! More accidents, injuries, and deaths is a sacrifice Elon is happy to make in the name of profit. Seriously though - how is this shit legal?

[–] FloridaBoi@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

Someone tried explaining to me that it’s a visual system because that’s how humans operate vehicles. Nevermind the 50k dead and 150k injured on US roads annually

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 3 days ago

Seriously though - how is this shit legal?

Sufficiently rich cishet white techbro asshole wants it, so it's legal.

[–] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago

Considering how most drivers already get treated it's not really surprising tbh. Basically a license to kill