this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
395 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3691 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 79 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would expect nothing less from them.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Christian Fascist state media, without the state (so far).

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Aren't you linking to Fox News airing it?

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They've SINCE edited it out, what don't you get?

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

From the article, it says this clip was aired after the original interview.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And this clip isn't on their website in this format anymore

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But the article is talking about what was aired, and now you're moving the goal posts requiring me to hunt around their website.

It's fine, I don't want to really defend them as they've done plenty to defend trump. But to talk down to me with the "what don't you get?" When you're just floundering all over the place,talking about things the article is not about, seems quite misplaced.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's the same goalposts as the original article

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

From the article:

The exchange, part of a June 2 sit-down with Fox & Friends, was cut from the original TV broadcast but later reappeared in full on Will Cain's Fox News radio show.

Why lie?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Surprised they didn't use AI to redo the whole answer and then blame Kamala for it if they ever got caught

[–] Bassman27@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Is this the crooked lamestream media he keeps rattling on about?

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Didn't this asshole just "truth" about 60 minutes doing this for Harris? How on the nose is the whole "Every accusation is a confession" is it with these people?!

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Since they can only think about themselves, they cannot think of someone taking an action that they didn't already do

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago

I've been interviewed several times by traditional media in my own political work. It's very common to basically get a mulligan if you have what they call a "false start". Unless the network is just out to do a hit piece on you. Anyway, yea, Trump more or less is always confessing when he makes any kind of accusation.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Heads up this article is 4 months old, just in case you were feeling some deja vu.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

Oh oops, didn't see the date was a bit ago. I saw it linked elsewhere online first and didn't catch that it was from june when reading the article

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] omega_x3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And then I noticed that she was sitting on...her..sweet...can...oh just thinking about that sweet can...

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago