this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
795 points (91.7% liked)

Memes

45441 readers
892 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 188 points 2 months ago (70 children)

I know someone said more or less the same thing when it was posted on Tumblr, but if the schools realize most of their students don't know a thing they should know... Shouldn't they teach it?

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 91 points 2 months ago (1 children)

its not in their standardized tests and that's the only thing that determines funding. Its a nightmare ...

[–] Lemming421@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

Apparently it’s literally in the standardised tests… that’s what’s causing the problems! 😉

load more comments (69 replies)
[–] Machefi@lemm.ee 146 points 2 months ago (15 children)

I know, it's just a meme, but... The article. It's about clocks during exams specifically, when students are under pressure and more likely to misread the time on an analogue clock.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 71 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Thanks for expounding upon that. It's shit like this that gets spread around and older gens pat themselves on the back while shaking their head at the younger gen for not knowing something, despite it being taken out of context or even straight up false.

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 21 points 2 months ago (5 children)

To be honest, even if it were completely true... okay? If analogue clocks are on the way out then there's no particular need for anyone to be able to read them any more. I like them a lot visually and have a couple in my home, but there's nothing so special about them that people would be missing out by using digital clocks instead

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ngwoo@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago (8 children)

If only there was a building children could attend where they do things like teach how clocks work

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 83 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Sounds like divisive bullshit.

After all the millennial horseshit we had to hear in the 2010's and we're just gonna turn around and do the same shit, huh?

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Yup, hating on the next generation is a tale as old as time. Idk why, but every generation seems to do it. Maybe it's being uncomfortable with them being different or afraid of their youthfulness. I don't get it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 73 points 2 months ago

Alternate title: Students cannot tell the time because schools are removing analog clocks from the classroom

[–] Paradachshund 49 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The only reason you need to know analog clocks nowadays is to solve all the analog clock puzzles in video games.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] candle_lighter@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 months ago (5 children)

The only reason you need to own analog clocks nowadays is to practice solving all the analog clock puzzles in video games.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rotopenguin@infosec.pub 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Kids can't even read a sundial nowadays, smh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (12 children)

My first thought was to be appalled at the lack of education on display.... But is there any real reason to keep analog clocks.. other than habit and nostalgia?

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Other than the things already mentioned, you can read analog clocks easily from great distances, as long as the handles and the face have appropriate contrast (e.g. black on white). Even with impaired vision and large distance, being able to discern the rough position of black smudges on white background is enough to tell the time. This is not possible with a digital clock, because you can't distinguish between the digits as easily. Therefore, I'd certainly argue their much better for legibility in the back of a classroom or a lecture hall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's probably someplace kids could go to learn about analog clocks...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Asclepiaz@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

This has got to be rage bait like the litterbox thing right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rustydomino@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No one knows how to read a sextant any more. The horror!!

Analog clocks are not really essential technology.

[–] pewpew@feddit.it 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok but there are still many places with analog clocks, learning how they work shouldn't take more than 5 minutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 months ago

DAE younger generation bad

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Feels more like we should teach kids better rather than remove the clocks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I've worked in 2 different schools in the IT department and 4 others as a volunteer lecturer (I got a name tag that said Technology Evangelist) I found that putting an analog clock on the screen saver of computers in the classroom was more likely to result in the clock actually being on time.

Too many clocks in classrooms are very old or even battery powered but neglected.

I don't think kids are dumb just they aren't getting a world that is properly maintained by competent people that care about their work and are adequately resourced to do the whole job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 24 points 2 months ago

Always feels like these articles (and headlines in particular) are made to stir up division on social media.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I heard they’re gonna remove schools because kids show up to them not knowing anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anti_Face_Weapon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I don't believe this for a second. You can literally just look at it and intuitively understand. Not to mention part of the standard elementary school curriculum is how to read a clock.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] texasspacejoey@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Shouldnt we blame the teachers for fsiling to teach kids how to read the clock?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Emmie@lemmings.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (13 children)

Analog clocks are kind of annoying tbh. Sometimes you need that little extra energy you have to spend on wondering whether it is 11:37 or 11:38 already by carefully visually bisecting the circle section between 7 and 8.
Millimetres of white space keep you wondering about the nature of analogue vs digital, discrete vs continuous and measurement uncertainty while you have better things to do but cannot just give up on OCDing whether it is exactly 11:37:30 already or maybe it is 11:37:35? And boom in these seconds you were wondering it is already pointless because it is the past and now it is time to wonder if it is 11:38:15 or 11:38:30

Whereas for digital it is just:
oh it is 11:11 on 11.11.11, how cool, life’s good

Thus it is my opinion that analogue clocks are virgins whereas digital are chads

[–] sheogorath@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I love having an analog clock. It makes it feel like you have more time compared to a digital clock, making me more relaxed. For example, if the time is 12:34 PM, my subconscious will think, "Ahh, shit, 26 more minutes before 1 PM." But with an analog clock, I read it as around half an hour before 1 PM. The visual representation also helps, like seeing that there is a distance that the hands need to travel to reach a certain time.

All in all, I very much prefer having analog clocks vs digital when given the chance.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] openrain502r@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

bruh I can read analogue clocks and I'm gen z. it's probably rage bait though, so who cares :/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Recommend we call Clockwise "cap" and Counterclockwise "no cap"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

If only they still taught how to read a sundial, but those damn new fangled analog clocks...

[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 months ago

Sounds like a fake article

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Kids these days do absolutely still know how to read analog clocks.

Besides, they probably shouldn't put effort into that. Those things are close to useless nowadays. It's mostly a case of schools being conservative... but then, it's not that much of an effort, so there are more important things to care about.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So many edgelords in the comments shit talking younger generations for learning different things.
Y'all sound like old farts crying about how schools stopped using slide rules and how modern music just isn't as good.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago (10 children)

I think keeping analog tech along side the digital equivalent is probably a good idea, just in case. Plus learning varied systems makes for more adaptable and smarter people.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RangerJosie@sffa.community 16 points 2 months ago

ITT: Big boomer energy.

load more comments
view more: next ›