this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
147 points (88.9% liked)

Marvel Studios

2995 readers
36 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to MarvelStudios, a community for discussing all things related to Marvel TV/Film productions with a focus on Marvel Studios!

We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about Marvel Studios productions. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Upcoming TV/Film:


MCU TV/Film Discussion:


Non-MCU Discussion:


Misc Discussion:


Related Communities:


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 75 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I did not have "RDJ comes back to the MCU as a non-Stark character" on my bingo card

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 45 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

watch it be a multiverse version of Tony Stark.

edit: also if this is legit I am disappointed they didn't long-tease the reveal in movies or post credit scenes. this seems very un-marvel, maybe out of desperation. they straight up blew what could have been the biggest and most shocking reveal in history.

edit 2: also, how long until "I am Dr Doom!"

[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tony made Ultron as the ultimate defense around the world. I could see the idea going a slightly different way and that Tony being a little more ambitious/evil, next thing you know he's Doom.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get that I'm in the minority, but I think this is going to not be related to Iron Man at all.

Rdj has range. And Doom wears a mask. I think he decided he was too old to keep playing Tony and wanted to retire the character on a high note, but the movies are fun to make and make him a mint, so when they offered a recast he went for it. But I don't think he'd want to screw with the completed story for Tony Stark's character.

I think RDJ is just going to play Doom, and he'll do a good enough job that no one is going to confuse the characters. Based on his acting choices, that's my guess.

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That just sounds super confusing. I know Marvel has done that with some smaller characters, but Tony Stark is the closest thing the MCU has/had to a main character. If it's not an alternate Ironman it'll just confuse audiences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It will almost certainly be a multi verse Tony Stark gone evil.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And I'll bet anything it's Spider-Man that unmasks him and discovers it, leading to a whole mental breakdown by Peter.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hasn't Peter had enough breakdowns yet?

[–] CaptainEffort@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

With great power, comes great meltdowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Have you read the comics? If not - Peter Parker is constantly traumatized by shit going horribly wrong or failing to account for something frequently. I'd say it's a running gag but Stan Lee wanted a super hero people could connect with at a human level.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That seems like something they should’ve waited to reveal during the movie, like had some misdirection about RDJ just being in it for a flashback or a recorded video, just downplay it and make it seem small. Then bust the revelation out midway through the movie.

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm sure they considered that possibility. But imagine the revenue. RDJ and Doom are both huge draws. Revealing them both in advance gets you more makes money gesture

[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 7 points 2 months ago

Now we can make money and make a shitty movie.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

but you can do that in other ways in-universe as they did with thanos and other upcoming characters. its very un-marvel.

[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I found this post browsing All. I have had significant superhero fatigue right after infinity war part 2, after a whole decade of mild disbelief at how huge these once-niche characters have become.

This headline definitely grabbed my attention, and as you said, the fact that they’re spoiling that he’s going to play Doom is why I checked this thread.

revealing them both

Even mentioning them as separate things wouldn’t have made me look. Their marketing machine is definitely working overtime to get the attention of people burned out on superhero movies.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pronell@lemmy.world 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] Aku@lemm.ee 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] MimicJar@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago
[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I don’t like it. Seems weird. An article I read said that he would NOT be playing a multiverse version of Doom, but actually Victor Von Doom.

Now, based on that I have two thoughts:

  1. He was originally a Tony Stark multiverse version but became corrupted and no longer thinks of himself as Tony so he IS Victor Von Doom (like an identity shift).

  2. He has Tony Stark’s face and will be revealed in a mask off moment. However, the twist is that it’s actually a Doombot and Tony’s face is used to mess with the Avengers. Maybe Doombots can have any face he chooses?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dumbass@leminal.space 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, they did ask for this treatment with that username.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean it’s definitely odd, but if he’s masked the whole time, then I guess it’s the same as any other actor doing it.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

then by that logic why have RDJ do it anyway.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Studio had about 75 million dollars laying around and figured, "what the hell?"

[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't agree with the assertion that we definitely won't see his face, but the star power will be a draw.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

well yeah that was my point. if they are using RDJ clearly they are going to use him in a recognizable way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So they're doing a hard pivot away from the Kang stuff after the combination of the Majors scandal and underperformance of Quantumania?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What's the majors scandal?

[–] CptEnder@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

They already have, Loki Season 2 was tossed out the window in re-writes because of it.

[–] HomerianSymphony@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Well now. That's a course correction.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No way lmao. It'll be good I'm sure, but Doom seems like a bigger bad than just one movie. Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Is he really jumping in for another round of films?

His bed of money wasn't as comfortable anymore, so he wanted a bit more padding

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] esc27@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm kind of weirdly excited because I've been wanting him to come back as Doctor Doom for awhile now but didn't think it would actually happen.

There's just so much room for character drama with our avengers having to make sense of a villainous version of their hero. Also room to play with the dichotomy of stark being a man of science and Doom more into magic.

[–] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Is there a reason you wanted RDJ for Doctor Doom? I haven't read the comics so I'm unfamiliar but I would have expected him not even to be in the conversation. Is there some kind of cannon connection between stark and him? I always thought his link was to the Fantastic Four primarily.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tony Stark and Victor Von Doom are entirely separate people. Unless there's some bizarre series I'm not aware of connecting them.

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

There was a short comic run where Dr. Doom becomes Ironman after Tony dies that I really liked. The only thing connecting them is that they're both dudes in suits of armor otherwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

There's a "What If...?" comic where Tony, not Reed Richards, is Vic's college roommate and Vic ends up stealing Tonys identity, literally a "Freaky Friday" Marvel version.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Iron Man can't be Doc Doom. No.

[–] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There's actually a multiverse where tony stark becomes doom. Just an fyi

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›