this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
83 points (88.8% liked)

Facepalm

356 readers
2 users here now

Anything that makes you apply your hand to your face.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I mean factor 2 is a bit much but if you want everyone to finish roughly in the same time frame distribution, you either have to do a shorter route or have the women start earlier. Otherwise you will have a decent time gap between male and female race finishers, which looks even worse if u ask me.

Gender equality is usually not about physical performance because everyone knows that there is a gap there that wont go away anytime soon. Its about socioeconomic factors like pay, medical issues, etc

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 16 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But why have routes based on gender? They could just have had two routes to choose from and let it be up to the individual.

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

That’s the way it should have been done. I can fun a 5K in about 40min. I know plenty of woman who kick my ass up and down the street based on that time.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Because there's a cash prize involved. Many male runners could easily snag the prize that's supposed to encourage women to also participate in sport.

Yes, you can find plenty logical flaws in this system. But it's a matter of perfect being the enemy of good.

The hope is that it's better for gender equality to also offer prize money for the fastest of some rather arbitrary group ("women"), because then they have any chance of winning at all.
The downside is that it leads to all kinds of conflicts, because what in the absolute flying fuck is a woman?

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean factor 2 is a bit much but if you want everyone to finish roughly in the same time frame distribution, you either have to do a shorter route or have the women start earlier.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Why would you want everyone to finish roughly at the same time though? I'm sure there would be plenty of woman who could finish 5km much faster than some men would finish 10km.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but the average distribution is going to have most men running faster than most women.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Math is apparently still hard. I even specifically wrote "distribution" but i guess that was not enough.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Usually for these races they will set a cut off time and also block off traffic for that time frame only. Personally i am with you and would find it cool if they did the same race and see a few very athletic women overtaking most of the average performing men.

[–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 1 points 3 months ago

I don’t see the issue in letting everyone run the same 10 km at the same time. A man will probably finish first, so what? Equality is not about being the same, it’s about being equal. You can easily have separate results for men and women. In fact, that’s pretty standard for these kinds of amateur races in my experience. You can also have multiple start times based on self reported running speeds. Also pretty common and avoids slow people being in the way of fast people.