this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
653 points (91.2% liked)

Antifascism

287 readers
1 users here now

A community to post acts of antifascism and other left-wing activism. Please message a mod if you would like something posted and we can tag you in the post as well.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
653
Reminder (midwest.social)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by seahorse@midwest.social to c/antifascism@midwest.social
 

credit: punk with a camera

Edit: every report for these posts goes to me and I'm not taking it down so don't bother.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Dkarma@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The social contract says we all agree to not kill each other. If party A's fundamental stance is that it is ok to kill X group AND THIS IS TOLERATED then the social contract has been broken and party A has subjected themselves to the same rules they now apply to others.

This is not opinion. This is how it plays out in real life. If your stance is that my life is forefeight or disposable, then so is yours.

Just remember party A made this choice not their victims who choose to fight back.

This is why fascists insist there is no Holocaust. Because if they admitted it they would admit it's fair game on anyone who shares their ideology.

[โ€“] BobTheDestroyer@lemm.ee -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I can't tell if this is simply saying that you have the right to self-defense, which is obvious and agreed upon pretty much everywhere in the US, or whether it's saying that, since we've all agreed not to kill each other if those guys want to murder us then we have the right to murder them. If it's the later then either you don't understand irony or you don't really care about the 'social contract'.

It sometimes feels like folks on this community are looking forward to a cultural civil war just as much as the right-wing maga nuts.