this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
795 points (98.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21047 readers
721 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    795
    someone tell them (lemmy.world)
    submitted 5 months ago by siriusmart@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    84 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 37 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

    I'm sure there are workarounds. That's besides the point.

    If they had said "we don't recommend you install this" that would be completely fine and understandable. But that's not what happened. I wasn't presented with any option to bypass it. I was just told no. I shouldn't have to Google how to do that. It's completely absurd.

    Fun fact: it also won't let me turn off Bluetooth. How fucking batshit is that?

    [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    I so often can’t stand e.g. important privacy toggles being hidden deep in settings, dark patterns that obfuscate permitted but unprofitable behavior - so you’d think I’d be with you on this 100%.

    And yet…

    If they had said "we don't recommend you install this"

    , grandma would hit OK without reading it.

    For every dollar someone has paid tech support to help them install a desired app from an unidentified developer, I’d bet ten dollars have been saved from others not being able to install some spyware. Maybe that murky little dialogue box is good enough for the lowest common denominators that it outweighs the annoyance for us nerds? (Our small cost being we’re required to Searx once for the solution to learn how to bypass it)

    [–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

    grandma would hit OK without reading it.

    Then grandma would be responsible.

    I don't buy it. Because Apple has lied about this sort of thing time and time again. Giving us bullshit explanations about why they won't let us control "our" devices. "Security", over and over again they use this bullshit to explain away all kinds of self-serving shitfuckery. I'm certain it has far more to do with their 30% app store fees.

    [–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

    Ohhhhh THAT

    Point would stand in that I’d say $1 spent, $10 saved… but a million made by Apple 😉