this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2023
-5 points (33.3% liked)

conservative

935 readers
6 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Times certainly isn't a conservative newspaper. If even they are saying Portland has become horrible, it must be worse than anybody can imagine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10A@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Left seems to collectively envision a future in which everyone is fully dependent on the government to survive. I suspect efforts like this drug deregulation are a means to that end. There's some threshold of homelessness, say 50% or 60% of the city's population, above which they'll step in and say "enough is enough, we need public housing for everyone." At that point they'll enact civil forfeiture to seize all private housing, and the entire city population can be housed in tenement "projects". Boom, homeless problem solved. And as a bonus, they have 100% of the population voting Democrat if they're sober enough to vote. With everyone in public housing, they can run it like a prison, with metal detectors and strip searches to prohibit gun ownership. Municipal wifi can prohibit access to "far-right extremist" news sources. Public meal programs can ensure that nobody eats meat, and everyone gets their shots. Basically paradise on earth, and Portland is leading our progress.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's some serious conspiracy theory territory.

So, a non-exhaustive list of things that seem very odd to me in this comment:

  1. "The Left" is an incredibly vague term that groups together a lot of different groups that have hugely different ideologies and perspectives

  2. Decriminalization has proven to work extremely well in some contexts. Not all decriminalization is created equal. Portugal's system has proven amazingly successful at dropping rates of illegal drug use. Mandatory rehab and access to psychological help instead of prison time has proven to work very well. Not got a great idea about the specific attempt in Oregon, but it's not some deep conspiracy: it's attempts (some better, some worse) at finding ways to address drug abuse problems in society.

  3. If homelessness is at 50%, that basically means the entire housing market has completely failed. That's not "a homelessness problem", that's a housing market that has failed in such fundamental ways that I don't see how that could even happen in a country that isn't trying intentionally to increase the homeless population. California, the state with the highest homeless population (and it is a real problem!) has a homeless population of 0.44% of the total population. 50% feels like such an arbitrary ass-pull number. Even 5% would be considered a complete collapse of the housing market.

  4. Automatically assuming that those trying to restart their lives are brainless alcoholics is so reductive I don't even know where to start. The most effective and proven way to reduce the number of homeless people is to focus on a housing first approach. You house them, you provide them professionals to help sort out their issues, get them into a job and have them start paying off the house. This is an internationally proven approach.

The rest just goes into full dystopian future fan fiction, so I'll stop there.