this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
363 points (79.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21057 readers
859 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    363
    The installation process of different Linux distributions (feddit.de)
    submitted 6 months ago by e8d79@feddit.de to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    129 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Agility0971@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Personally I've had more issues tweaking Debian to just work as needed then Arch

    [–] zarenki@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

    I never had problems with Debian stable, especially on headless server. But it's not especially well-suited for brand new desktop hardware; even Ubuntu LTS and RHEL focus more on hardware enablement backports than Debian.

    I've had a worse experience with Debian testing breaking my system with updates than Arch. Adding to that the freeze period (2012's was the worst, lasting 11 months) makes testing feel like the worst of both worlds between rolling and standard release distros.

    [–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Agreed. Try to setup newer nvidia drivers, a newer kernel and it is the furthest from stable as any distro ever was.

    [–] Shareni@programming.dev 2 points 6 months ago

    Using an unstable kernel and drivers on Debian is the crackhead type of tweaking

    [–] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

    Debian is the only distro in my recent memory that crashed into an unbootable state right after a default installation.
    Manual Arch installation is tedious and unnecessary if you've done it once, and the automated archinstall fails too often. Other than that, I've had literally zero issues with it.

    [–] idefix@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

    It's even worse with Fedora in my experience. Always some weird default, strange issue, missing packages that take ages to fix until you decide it's not the right distribution for you. And you go with Debian, Arch, Manjaro, Mint, etc...