this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023

18 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk technology

2336 readers

1 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

poVoq@slrpnk.net

KeraKali@slrpnk.net

18

graceful degradation: the opposite of planned obsolescence (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 year ago by stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to c/technology@slrpnk.net

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cool. Very cool. But this nothing to do with planned obsolescence.

[–] pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Not this particular example, maybe, but the concept of a device remaining usable in failure runs counter to planned obsolescence.

[–] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you mean "nothing to do with"? The title literally says "the opposite of planned obsolescence", which is planning the failure of a device. This is showing the planned continued use of a device when parts of it fails.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Planned obsolescence is taking steps to ensure the device fails.

But if I have a device that requires four batteries to function and one of them fails and this causes the device to stop working, that's not planned obsolescence, it's just not graceful degradation. It isn't planned obsolescence because the device isn't useless, I just need to put some new batteries in.