Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54300 readers

397 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

💰 Please help cover server costs.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

220

Switched from uTorrent to QBitTorrent (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by Greyfoxsolid@lemmy.world to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So a bunch of people in this subreddit told me that uTorrent was trash and to switch to QBitTorrent.

I didn't think much of it. How could one be so much better than the other? They're both just torrent downloaders.

Holy shit was I wrong. I don't even really understand what is happening, but downloading torrents on QBitTorrent is so, so, so much faster and I don't even understand how.

A movie downloads in basically seconds compared to 10 or 20 minutes on uTorrent.

Why is this? What is this magic? What makes QBitTorrent so much faster?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Blaster_M@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I prefer Transmission, as they have Windows ports as well.

[–] shikitohno@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

So does Qbittorrent, if you're unaware.

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Yup, I'm using transmission in a docker container that ensures my VPN is always connected. Nice to not have to worry about that.

[–] nudnyekscentryk@szmer.info 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Transmission afaik does not have a built-in search functionality with plugins for popular trackers

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 months ago

That feature makes sense to aggregate search results from multiple public trackers, but if you (like me) use private trackers then it's almost always easier to just go to the actual website for your search. Not to mention any automation software such as the *arr stack make that feature obsolete. It's definitely a cool feature, but not useful for everyone.