this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
45 points (95.9% liked)

Hacker News

3871 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grayman@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Funny of them to use a silver dollar that doesn't change in actual value over time.

[–] manucode@infosec.pub 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why wouldn't its value fluctuate over time? What's actual value, anyway?

[–] grayman@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Gold and silver hasn't changed in value long term. What you could get with it 100 years ago is what you can get with it today. The price has tracked inflation well since the day we went off the standard. What has changed is its price. Fiat currency is just that... Fiat. The value of fiat is only the confidence that people have in it having that value.

[–] manucode@infosec.pub 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The value of fiat is only the confidence that people have in it having that value.

The same could be said about precious metals. While they have some usefulness in technology, most of their value comes from what we attribute to them.

[–] grayman@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's scarcity and usefulness.

[–] SciPiTie@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 10 months ago

This is simply wrong:

https://www.macrotrends.net/1333/historical-gold-prices-100-year-chart

That's not to say that depending on strategy there's no place for gold - simply that your statement is absolutely wrong.