this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
606 points (100.0% liked)

196

16351 readers
31 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

THAT makes sense why ani.social defederated from Lemmy.ml (I only subscribed to the anime instance since it had the largest user base)

Edit: the “.ml” anime instance is still the largest compared to everyone else. What a shame that we can’t move away from it

This was Ani’s side of the story: https://ani.social/comment/2199318

[–] Metal_Zealot@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy.ml defederated from ani.social, pretty sure cuz the borderline pedo bait

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yep. Explicitly because of CSAM

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Gonna have to be that guy again, but underage cartoon porn is not CSAM. CSAM as a term was invented to help law enforcement focus their limited resources on actual child victims. Underage cartoons are still child pornography, and still wrong and illegal, but CSAM is something else and deserves more immediate action.

There's no point in having technical terminology if it isn't used correctly :o)

[–] naught@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Good point. Lemmy.ml admins said CSAM was the reason so just passing that along.

[–] Microw@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't visit ani.social, a quick glimpse just now shows me a few Images that seem like borderline, but not straight-up "drawn sexualized child characters". No idea how they usually are.

But from following the story, it seems pretty typical that even the lemmy.ml admins - who develop Lemmy as a whole - would do a defederation without a public transparent process or even a notification to the deferated instance. That's straight up unpolite.