this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
188 points (93.5% liked)

News

23223 readers
3305 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Morrissey said if new testing of the gun showed it was working, she would recharge Baldwin.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

stupid comment:

  • people who have different opinions that you are not "trolls" they just disagree with you
  • do you think pro 2A folks think that people that commit gun crimes shouldn't be punished?

One thing they rightfully always bring up is that in many of these shootings, the existing laws weren't even being followed, yet they always spur cries for new laws that would only hurt law abiding citizens.

I am going to ask you to actually consider the following situation. Let's say in the future hate speech is criminalized. If someone goes and says something very evil, would you support removing the first amendment rights of all citizens based on their actions?

[–] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate speech is currently criminalized, in certain situations. And it hasn't resulted in the first amendment rights of all citizens being removed.

So why would "well regulat[ing]" purchases of fire arms lead to the removal of 2nd amendment rights?

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, I said hate speech as an example, but you are correct, hate speech is generally only used as a way to increase sentences of people that commit other hate crimes.

However, there are many instances that speech is limited by the government, and they don't violate the first amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_free_speech_exceptions#%3A%7E%3Atext%3DCategories_of_speech_that_are%2Claw%2C_true_threats%2C_and_commercial?wprov=sfla1

So, I ask again with the new context:

We currently have limitations on free speech, and yet we still have free speech. And we currently have limitations on the second amendment (you can't own a nuclear or biological weapon legally).

So how would a couple more limitations completely remove the right to own arms?

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So how would a couple more limitations completely remove the right to own arms?

it is an obvious slippery slope.

there will never be a time in which people who seek to restrict the 2A will go:

"ah, yes, this is enough limitations, we are done"

that's why it's important to put your foot down and stop it in its tracks.

[–] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you may have missed the connection to the first amendment.

I assumed you believed in the conspiracy theory "slippery slope", I was wondering why you think the slope isn't slippery for the first amendment, but just the second?

[–] applejacks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"conspiracy theory"

my brother, it is simple pattern recognition.

[–] Jericho_One@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Do you not answer because you can't explain?