this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
81 points (96.6% liked)

Hacker News

3871 readers
3 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] birdcurtains@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn’t they just spend the money and not use evaporative cooling? it’s a solvable problem.

[–] Veltoss@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a "this is cheaper and we're greedy" problem but people will add this to their AI fearmongering and hating circlejerks.

Apparently they're looking into nuclear reactors for this which doesn't waste as much water from what I understand.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand how a nuclear reactor could cool a datacenter. Could you explain?

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could supply power for better A/C?

I admit that doesn't make sense, but then neither does it make sense to cool a data center with evaporative water cooling as if it were a hit-and-miss engine from the 1910's, so I dunno.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cooling with evaporative cooling does make some sense since it works. It's absolutely not ideal though.

It should totally be a closed water (or other fluid) loop and where possible build datacenters in cooler climates.

[–] vidarh@lemmy.stad.social 1 points 1 year ago

Latency limits datacenter placement a lot, but for batch jobs like AI training it's certainly an option.