this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
73 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13484 readers
978 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I never understood why they needed to fly all the way down that narrow trench, they're in space, just enter the trench right next to the exhaust port.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm guessing that it's a transversal gun turret angle thing, where from a distance a head-on approach would get a trajectory of turbolasers that'd butcher anything approaching that way.

Or rule of cool, which is more likely.

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago

I know now that the real reason for it is that Lucas liked a similar scene from The Dam Busters.

That's what I respect the most about him, like a true nerd he got to mash together all the stuff he liked and make a lot of money doing it.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Or rule of cool, which is more likely.

Making your spaceships operate on WW2 dogfight logic is definitely cool lol

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Last Jedi had plenty that could be criticized, but the "bombs dropping in space" part was such a Reddity thing to fuss about: it was just more applied ww2 in space.

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuckin CinemaSins brained dorks lol

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Star Wars was never supposed to be hard scifi and even as a kid I may have wondered about the trench run, but I realized the movies would've been much worse without explosions in space.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 2 points 16 hours ago

Or sound effects in space, or visible "laser" projectiles in space.

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 12 points 1 day ago

It's all rule of cool. But presumably the exhaust port has heavier defences. In real life flying low in a plane or helicopter makes it harder to hit with air defences because you can't see it for long enough to work out when to fire in front of it or hit it with anything that can track it. Plus radar and other stuff find it harder to identify. So presumably they get close to the death star, swoop into the trench for cover and then try and hit the port with their missiles. If they flew head on either turrets or missile batteries would have got them.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought of that in my childhood; if it was more tightly explained like "getting under the port's very wide shield" or something, that might've been satisfactory.

[–] SSJ3Marx@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

A bunch of aspects of the battle are really vague, like why do the rebels spend time shooting at the "deflection towers" and not just all make a beeline for the trench? The movie doesn't need to explain all that of course but that won't stop me from picking apart every single line of dialogue and reverse engineering a more complex account of the rebel's attack plan.

[–] carpoftruth@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

friend, you are walking a path that leads to diegetic essentialism. the only thing essential about it is that you don't go down there

https://www.reddit.com/r/Sigmarxism/comments/11wt3kp/the_plague_of_diegetic_essentialism_or_how_i/

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

"And that one game from the 90s that is why every mainline Zelda game ever after must have the same three characters repeating the same three story beats" nerd

[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] Ivysaur@hexbear.net 2 points 1 day ago

I was just thinking about this post the other day! I couldn’t remember what the term they came up with was.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you happy? You made George Lucas cry.

[–] grazing7264@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

On real planes some missiles are guided by directional radios mounted on the noses of the planes they're fired from, and approaching it from too high would expose fighters to AA turrets all over the surface so the trench would be useful as cover

[–] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think the turrets were much of a problem, it's been a while since I watched the movie, but most if not all of the rebel fighters were taken out by TIEs.

Hell, they couldn't even hit the much bigger Millennium Falcon, although that's probably more a plot hole.

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, they were mostly taken out by TIEs because they did their whole attack plan to avoid most of the turrets

[–] grazing7264@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Since the Millennium Falcon is really fast at full speed maybe it strafed the ties while they were preoccupied and outran them before they could react, like a MIG-31 ambushing a trio of F-15s

[–] TC_209@hexbear.net 3 points 1 day ago

The starfighters' computers needed time to lock on to the exhaust port. Plus, the proton torpedoes needed to immediately dive downward into the exhaust shaft to reach the Death Star's core, as seen in the animation before the battle -- fire too soon and they just impact on the surface, fire too late and they hit the back of the port before they can dive.