this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

Science

13115 readers
31 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pg_jglr@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Shocked face... No surprise to anyone who has actually worked in that environment.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Absolutely. It’s a shit show.

And interestingly, making the general public more aware of this is likely quite important. Because 1, they have very idealistic views of what research is like, and 2, just about everyone is entering research blind to the realities. It’s a situation that needs some sunlight and rethinking.

IMO, a root cause is that the heroic genius researcher ideal at the base of the system’s design basically doesn’t really exist any more. Things are just too big and complex now for a single person to be that important. Dismantle that ideal and redesign from scratch.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I kind of suspect things were always too big and complex for one person to address but the rampant individualism of our society obscures that history.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Possibly, but when scientific knowledge and problems were smaller, one person could actually make a mark alone IMO. And if they happened upon a new discovery or insight then they’d appear to be geniuses, all alone.

At some point, when the work to make a discovery requires more than one person and the amount of theory involved in understanding its significance is too much for one person to be authoritative on all of it, then it’s a team sport.