this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
530 points (95.4% liked)

World News

38870 readers
2131 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 102 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I admit, first time I read that headline I was like, "WHAT? Israel adding Asbestos to their bombs now? How sinister. What's next - radon?" It took a minute to get up to speed.

[–] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 70 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Same. Per the article, the structures being destroyed have asbestos in them from when they were built; this is the cause of it being released

Edit: I’ve never before seen a comment like the reply to mine here below that was so clearly made by an AI bot

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Asbestos is a massive curse that the world should never have been put into their buildings. There are tons of buildings all over the world that still have asbestos in them.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It has great material properties aside from, you know, destroying people's lungs. So I can understand why the world was eager to use it before understanding the risks.

[–] Almrond@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The ancient Romans made it a point to not buy slaves from the asbestos mines due to their poor health, it has been known for far too long that asbestos is harmful. It also happens to be insanely useful.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The ancient Romans used asbestos?

Edit: damn, it has been used since forever...

https://www.unrv.com/economy/asbestos.php

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

I am aware of its incredible fireproofing ability. Also it is one of the few, if only, minerals that can be woven into fabric.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

I wouldn't have put it past them.

[–] poo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Me too - wouldn't put it past them, Israel is disgusting enough to sink to that level.

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean.. the effect is the same. The buildings didn't explode themselves.

[–] bazus1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

Well, my second thought was, "that's pretty short-sighted if you're gonna Zionist all over the destroyed area.. why would you introduce a carcinogen when..." and by then it clicked. The zionists don't want carcinogens either, but explosively spreading existing asbestos is the price they're willing to pay for genocide.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah the problem is the building material used. The headline had me confused as fuck too.