this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
557 points (99.3% liked)

Greentext

4237 readers
930 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 35 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

What drone is OP getting that it's only $35? I don't think I've seen them from anything less than about $200 and a good one is about $500 to $700

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

kamicaze drones are pretty cheap

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Analog fpv drone is at least €150 when produced on a mass scale. Parts alone.

This is nowhere near 35 bucks cheap.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

But those FPV drones have to be reusable. A kamikaze drone only needs to last long enough to get to the target. Motors, batteries, etc don’t need to have long lifetimes. Think about how cheap the battery can be if it doesn’t need to be rechargeable. If the motor needs at most 5 hours of runtime?

Even if they have a 10% spontaneous failure rate of they’re 30% the price it’d still be worth it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

It won't make much of a difference. They put rechargeable batteries in disposable vapes because it isn't worth it to manufacture non-rechargeable batteries, even though the batteries would be technically cheaper, the specialized manufacturing process would be more expensive.

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

This is wendys.

[–] bi_tux@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

of course it's not that cheap, but still pretty cheap

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, precisely right. When compared to military precission weapons. That start at tens of thousands.

And I gave as real of a number as possible, so there are no idiots thinking an fpv drone costs 35 bucks. Even if it has to fly once.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's called a grenade?

[–] lowered_lifted@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the drone pictured is a mavic 3 so at least $3000

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 weeks ago

This particular one is the Mavic 3 pro, indeed around that price with the accessories. It's what I fly for work.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know all the specific models and everything, but I do know drone warfare has been a pretty big deal and so has trying to make the cheapest ones possible. Here's a good video on the topic: https://youtu.be/V3eOjRhihLU

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right? I'll give OP $50 a pop to source those $35 drones that are at least good enough to strap a grenade to and kill people. I don't wanna kill people, but if it can carry a grenade, it can probably carry a camera and stuff.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago

One of them can have a grenade, my neighbor is kind of annoying.

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've flown a number of drones and the best drone I've flown that clocks in under £100 is a tiny-whoop and they're absolutely not fit for combat lol.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I really hope that "tiny-whoop" is its official name

[–] DrownedRats@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Tiny-whoop more reffers to a class of FPVs rather than any specific drone. They're small enough to be flown around indoors and typically weigh in at under 25g TOM. I guess you could use one for surveillance or scoping out a building in the field but defo not for combat lol