this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

Sports

1604 readers
9 users here now

All things in the world of sports, from trade rumors to milestones to Finals and more.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link

For people assigned male at birth, variations in anatomy that enhance their athletic abilities are often deemed impressive, such as wide “wingspans” or a long stride. People with large amounts of those explosive, fast-twitch muscle fibers may pack a powerful punch or hoist a massive clean and jerk. But for people assigned female at birth, some of those same variations are suddenly unfair advantages. This is especially true when those variations cross over into what people perceive as traits that are “manly.” No one complains of the flexibility and strength of female gymnasts—it is merely amazing. A powerful triple axel on the ice is perfectly feminine when done in a skirt. But a powerful punch? A cheetah-fast sprint? Variation is suddenly of deep concern.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ultimately this is just a problem of anyone listening to trash on the Internet.

Imane earned her spot and her podium. The Olympics and other organizations have stuff set up to ensure fair competition. No one should care for a second what alphawolf69 thinks on the topic.

I'm not diluting the current issue. It's very important. But society should shift to stop considering bigots on Twitter as important discourse.