this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
113 points (98.3% liked)

politics

22227 readers
181 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
FidelCastro@hexbear.net
invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net
Alaskaball@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
blashork@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
113
Should we send politicians to prison for climate crimes? The majority of the public think so. (www.thecanary.co)
submitted 1 month ago by DivineChaos100@hexbear.net to c/politics@hexbear.net
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] robinnist@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We can see the phrasing, at least in English:

It should be a criminal offence for leaders of large businesses or senior government officials to approve or permit actions they know are likely to cause damage to nature and climate that is widespread, long term or cannot ​be reversed

The responses “Strongly agree” and “Tend to agree” with the statement are the 72%

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that they know

How do we prove, definitively, what they knew at the time?

[–] Inui@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Looking at their emails and other messages to see if those risks were communicated and ignored. Forcing them to produce documents researching and stating their potential impact before they're allowed to undergo certain actions. Using common sense like "dumping garbage in a river is bad".