where_am_i

joined 1 year ago
[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No, it makes it zero disgusting. It's a person making a passionate calling. She simply calls for others to follow their steps, she's a woman and a mother, and believes everything she says, and is probably happy and fulfilled and is wishing that to others.

You seem to be triggered af by literally everything and can't see when someone's heart is in the right place regardless of whether you agree with them or not.

Maybe that snowflake term your older generation used was correct. Cuz, frankly, you guys act like a bunch of rebellious teenagers. Kinda cringe.

Oh, I'm an atheist, feminist, child-free, I don't have a tweeter, and where I live abortions are legal. And you're cringe even to me.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 hours ago

And if you do want children and are fulfilled living a life dedicated to making and raising them, you're also still valid.

In fact, that would be an accomplishment, while simply existing isn't. But this planet got an overpopulation problem, so if all you wanna do is continue simply and unimportantly existing while also not procreating, I'd say, go ahead.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Interest in solar panels has skyrocketed, and yet at least 50% of the world population won't stop driving ICE cars to work every day any time soon. While the ocean surface temperatures are on an exponential trajectory.

A climate catastrophy with mass deaths is inevitable. I'd be preparing instead of sugar-coating.

And after a few billion humans die, we can deploy solar panels and start living sustainably.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago

The number is going down, it is not going to zero.

So, how about out of 20 movies, 18 cut the crap, and the other two put some fuckin effort into their sex scenes.

And that's kids how you make an argument about capitalist suppression of sex. Netflix can probably get a 10% revenue boost if they just cut out all the "stimulating" sex scenes.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The world didn't do shit.

It was as normal in Europe to be naked and talk about sex as it is now. Actually, it probably got even a bit more normal.

Your stupid Hollywood is somehow watched by everyone around the world while it's produced to cater to your dumb average American. And they're religious and prudent. And that has been the case since forever. Which is why having naked breasts in your cinema is something wild.

In the meantime french movies would casually have people full naked every second movie.

Am I really on a movies community?

--

Now, your dumb Hollywood realized their cringe sex scenes aren't appreciated by about anyone, and so they cut them out. Big deal.

Definitely not the world shifting, and not even your moronic populace. Proportion of religious prudes is still dropping even in the dumbfuckistan. And yet no more sex in the movies. Go figure.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The disappearance of the sex scene in American cinema, the suppression of the body under the moral imperative of commodities in neoliberal capitalism, and Verhoeven as antagonizer.

Bro, you gotta stop reading shit like this. It's bad for your brain. Not everything is capitalistic plot to suppress your whatever.

Why wouldn't you be able to see it as "the viewers didn't enjoy our cringe sex scenes, so we got rid of them, cuz we sure as hell couldn't put real sex scenes into movies". And no, not because of purity. But because even good porn is cringe and fake.

So maybe it's really a decomcratic decision and it's only possible because through capitalism there's monetary pressure on the film industry to do the things people want.

Whichever it is, you gotta stop reading BS that starts with a conclusion in the first sentence, and no matter the subject it's the same conclusion: capitalism oppressing the working class. You'd make Lenin cringe.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Approximately the phrase with which JD starts the Scrubs.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because engineering is precise, measurable, and easily reproducible. You should be testing your things in a way that all you need is a simple two-sample Z-test.

Experiments on the humans, on the hand, unfortunately, have been outlawed. So all you get is a bunch of shitty noisy data, and yet you're supposed to somehow make sense of it. Most people with a degree in stats would tell you not to even try, and yet those fucks at phycology departments always do while having had about one undergrad-level class as part of their masters.

TL;DR good psychology programs nowdays train decent statisticians as they should.

[–] where_am_i@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Damn, looks like an elaborate course in probabilistic graphical models, sign me up!

 

It used to be that simple: r/plexshares, click any link, join the server, watch all you want.

Well, they really cracked down on that. Plex purged the servers en masse, my server switched to some obscure emby, r/plexshares is closed for good.

I'm in a need of a new server. Where do I even go? What platform is best to sail the seas now? Jellyfin?

P.S. my torrent days are over, thanks. I'm not interested in self-hosting anything either, again, thanks. 10$/month is a reasonable subscription fee for an all-you-can-eat streaming service

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

I understand that the battery degrades over time.

However, without any apparent reason I found my scooter does not charge above 51.6V while a full charge used to be 55.9V. (I own a Zero 9).

It hasn't been used for two weeks before this happened, but I left it roughly half-charged, which should be ideal for a long-term idle time.

Any clues on what's going on?

view more: next ›