vk6flab

joined 7 months ago
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 206 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The response from the owner just adds the missing ingredient.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 17 points 1 day ago (12 children)

How do airless tyres change the pile of waste? They still wear out and I suspect become economically unviable and are disposed of.

It's not like we can't recycle "normal " tyres today, it's that we don't.

The reason is that there's no economic incentive to do so (yet), and airless tyres don't do anything to change that as far as I know.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 21 points 3 days ago

Consider how much time you spend thinking specifically about each individual you know. That's how much time most people will think about you.

People who communicate with you don't generally hate you or even dislike you. It's much easier to ignore you if that's the case.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That's very interesting. Does this mean that you can test any backup without needing to do a manual data recovery taking several hours?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 days ago

Noted, thanks.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 3 days ago

Thank you, this gives me a starting point.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Do you know if this daily VM allows you to test functionality, or is it destroyed by the process without the ability to keep it, login and check databases, etc. ?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 3 days ago (13 children)

I doubt it.

Does it have a name?

11
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by vk6flab@lemmy.radio to c/sysadmin@lemmy.world
 

Anyone here have any experience with a Datto Backup Appliance?

I have just been told that they've never run a full restoration in the six years that it's been in service, deployed for the backup of four mission critical virtual Windows Servers, four Windows Workstation and a (physical?) Linux PABX server.

The actual appliance is apparently a "Datto S3-2000 BCDR"

Edit: The anal retentive in me is going WTF in a tight loop. The industry professional with 40 years experience in the field is going, different day, same old...

I realised that I didn't actually ask the pertinent question, the hamster wheel was running full tilt, but is this normal, or is this WTF, or somewhere in-between?

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 1 points 4 days ago

Well AWS ACM already automates this, so if the renewal period gets shortened, I'm guessing that this will be updated to suit, unless I'm misunderstanding your point.

I hadn't considered the CPU load, but that's a fair point. I'm guessing that a suitable piece of code will utilise specialised hardware, or perhaps leverage the GPU or just in time SSL certificates will become a thing.

 

Just watched the movie Argylle

Can someone please explain the phone call in the bathroom scene that causes Elly to run away and make a collect call?

 

Starting yesterday, Connect hard crashes when you attempt to click on the Inbox and the same happens if you click on the notification bell showing that there are messages.

As of this morning, the Inbox sidebar label is coloured Red instead of Blue.

Connect Version 1.0.190 Android v13 with latest security patches

 

A cookie notice that seeks permission to share your details with "848 of our partners" and "actively scan device details for identification".

 

How are you storing passwords and 2FA keys that proliferate across every conceivable online service these days?

What made you choose that solution and have you considered what would happen in life altering situations like, hardware failure, theft, fire, divorce, death?

If you're using an online solution, has it been hacked and how did that impact you?

 

My search has been without results.

My "new" model remote with a Siri button keeps needing to be reset to control my infrared amplifier. Press and hold the Volume Down and TV button works, but it's annoying when you want to change the volume whilst watching something and it doesn't respond.

Firmware version is 0x83.

Anyone got any ideas what might be causing this?

 

I've been using VMware for about two decades. I'm moving elsewhere. KVM appears to be the solution for me.

I cannot discover how a guest display is supposed to work.

On VMware workstation/Fusion the application provides the display interface and puts it into a window on the host. This can be resized to full screen. It's how I've been running my Debian desktop and probably hundreds of other virtual machines (mostly Linux) inside a guest on my MacOS iMac.

If I install Linux or BSD onto the bare metal iMac, how do KVM guests show their screen?

I really don't want to run VNC or RDP inside the guest.

I've been looking for documentation on this but Google search is now so bad that technical documents are completely hidden behind marketing blurbs or LLM generated rubbish.

Anyone?

 

There is a growing trend where organisations are strictly limiting the amount of information that they disclose in relation to a data breach. Linked is an ongoing example of such a drip feed of PR friendly motherhood statements.

As an ICT professional with 40 years experience, I'm aware that there's a massive gap between disclosing how something was compromised, versus what data was exfiltrated.

For example, the fact that the linked organisation disclosed that their VoIP phone system was affected points to a significant breach, but there is no disclosure in relation to what personal information was affected.

For example, that particular organisation also has the global headquarters of a different organisation in their building, and has, at least in the past, had common office bearers. Was any data in that organisation affected?

My question is this:

What should be disclosed and what might come as a post mortem after systems have been secured restored?

 

Anyone know of any scriptable asynchronous communication tools?

The closest so-far appears to be Kermit. It's been around since CP/M, but apparently there's still no centralised language reference and the syntax predates Perl.

26
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by vk6flab@lemmy.radio to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
 

U2F keys can be purchased online for the price of a cup of coffee. They're being touted as the next best thing in online security authentication.

How do you know that the key that arrives at your doorstep is unique and doesn't produce predictable or known output?

There's plenty of opportunities for this to occur with online repositories with source code and build instructions.

Price of manufacturing is so low that anyone can make a key for a couple of dollars. Sending out the same key to everyone seems like a viable attack vector for anyone who wants to spend some effort into getting access to places protected by a U2F key.

Why, or how, do you trust such a key?

The recent XZ experience shows us that the long game is clearly not an issue for some of this activity.

 

Genie: There are 3 rules... no wishing for death, no falling in love, no bringing back dead people.

Me: I wish envelopes would moan when you lick them.

Genie: There are 4 rules...

view more: next ›