theacharnian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Awesome. Looking forward to the day when Netanyahu and Gallant also get the treatment. Come on ICC, put out the warrants!

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 days ago

Ok, I'm convinced, let Alberta separate.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago
  1. that's not what they meant though, you removed the context of the phrase. Their point is that it's not as if when you remove sinwar suddenly the rest wake up from the matrix.

  2. Well, now. That's not a lie, habibi.

  3. sadly, also not a lie. Israel seems to have just created a a martyr. See: "Palestinians say drone footage shows Sinwar's 'heroic' final moments in Gaza".

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Please quote here the exact phrase from the post that is a lie.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Are they asking to do so? Is there an organization, entity, etc that argues for their return? If so, please let me know its name because I would want to donate to them because I 100% support their right to do so.

Because I don't have double standards. And to bring the focus back to Palestine and Israel, I 100% support the right of Jews to live and thrive in safety there AND I 100% support the right of Palestinians to do the exact same. No double standard. Same rights, same protections.

Do you accept that principle?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Saying that letting Palestinians work in their own ancestral land as precarious labour is "Israel supporting Palestinians", is like saying that Apartheid South Africa was such a supportive institution for letting the blacks in Soweto work outside the fucking Bantustan.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Don't be daft, he's explaining, not justifying.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

the depopulation of all the jews in Israel [is] what Palestinians in Gaza are advocating for

That's exactly as true and accurate as saying that "The Jews in Israel are advocating for the ethnic cleansing of all the Arabs from Eretz Yisrael". Such a phrase of course is antisemitic as fuck, and no reasonable person would say it. Just like your phrase is racist/anti-palestinian as fuck. Which makes me think you're not a reasonable person.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is simply a statement of fact: "Palestinians say drone footage shows Sinwar's 'heroic' final moments in Gaza".

This is not how peace will come. "You can do many things with bayonets except sit on them." ~ Talleyrand

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

At this point the Israelis have made the two state solution impossible because of their settling of the best lands of the West Bank in such a way that makes a contiguous truly independent Palestinian state impossible.

So the only way forward is Democracy with safety and equal rights for all, Jews, Muslims, Christians, and others from the river to the sea.

The Israeli right of the last 30 years has basically made it a choice between genocide and apartheid and the end of Zionism as we know it.

So there.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

Remember kids, you already know what Palestine without Hamas looks like: is the apartheid regime of the West Bank!

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

What's his beef with The Onion? Why is he trying to run them out of business?

14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/anarchism@slrpnk.net
 

Discussions about scarcity and anarchism that I've seen online seem to always talk about "scarcity in the large", i.e. how does an anarchist society allocate production, food, labour, materials etc.

I've a question about anarchism and scarcity in the small. Say, a really nice location, eg. a breezy location in a very hot climate, or the room with the nice windows in the community centre, or Bag End at the top of the hill. Say, an anarchist community has decided to use the location for purpose X, but a minority wants to use it for purpose Y. Maybe an even smaller minority wants to do Z, and a bunch of other people have their own little ideas about how to use it. Some are transient and could be accommodated (you get it on Tuesdays 5-7) but others might not be ("our sculpture project needs to dry out in that specific spot for the next 4 months, we know it blocks the view but it's the only place the breeze hits just right!") or could be contradictory (the siesta people vs the loud backgammon players can't both use the spot at high noon) or antagonistic (the teenagers who want to party late vs the new parents who need quiet for the babies). And dis-association doesn't really help here because that's the nice spot for many kilometers around or there is literally no way to create another beach for our small island community because that's literally the only place on the island where sand exists, so we can't just off and leave. (* Many of these examples are imagining a hot summer in an anarchist Greece, sorry it's almost August.)

It looks to me like a simple non-life-and-death scenario like this could potentially completely poison and destroy a community and in the face of that it would be the little death of anti-authoritarian organizing. Like yea, when life and death matters are at hand, anarchists will band together and conquer the bread. But petty small-scale little shit where it's managing annoyances and small grievances, I don't think non-authoritarian decision making can solve. And I suspect it's crap like this that has killed off many intentional communities and experiments or made them veer away from non-hierarchical, anti-authoritarian organizing.

Have anarchist thinkers seriously thought of this?

 

Submitting for this truly astonishing quote:

" Landlords in Quebec, however, feel they need to catch up to other provinces as Quebec is still one of the most affordable places to live in the country, said Jean-Olivier Reed, a spokesperson for the Quebec Landlord Association (APQ)."

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/23000968

Incapables de trouver du travail en français au Nouveau-Brunswick, ils pensent partir au Québec

 
view more: ‹ prev next ›