silence7

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

But in a fundamental sense, Trump’s most disturbing remark over the past few days may have been his unprompted comment about Abraham Lincoln during an appearance on Fox News: “Lincoln was probably a great president. Although I’ve always said, why wasn’t that settled, you know? I’m a guy that — it doesn’t make sense we had a civil war.”

...

And if he is, here’s the thing: The Civil War couldn’t have been “settled” by moderating Northern demands that the South give up its slaves, because there was no such demand.

Yes, Northern states had banned slavery within their own borders and many Northerners considered slavery abhorrent. But outspoken abolitionists who sought to end slavery everywhere were a small minority. If the South hadn’t seceded, slavery might well have continued unimpeded for decades.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 minutes ago

It's not about "man up" — it's about having the votes in Congress to do it. We didn't have that in 2009, when we last tried, and I'd be surprised if we have them now

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 hours ago

For sure. I just don't expect it to be durable unless we elect Harris.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 10 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

The problem is that the things he can do without congressional support can be easily overturned by the next President — and the Republicans have a majority in the House of Representatives.

 

The new rules under the Affordable Care Act would include emergency contraception, a newly approved nonprescription birth control pill, spermicides and condoms.

Democrats: for safe sex

Republicans: for creating a world where nobody dares do it

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The paper makes it clear that it can — and it's actually important to avoid doing things like random murder. But the kind of nonviolent acts we've seen so far aren't a problem.

They also had a null result on policy support; the main impact was activating people towards more moderate activist groups.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 7 hours ago

I don't expect commercial extraction to be limited to one area.

 

You want to counter this?

 

Federal and state researchers said there might be five million to 19 million tons of lithium, more than enough to meet the world’s demand for the battery ingredient.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 8 hours ago

In practice, I see people in your situation spend their additional budget on insulation and an air-source heat pump, rather than go to geothermal.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 11 points 9 hours ago

I'm not waiting — spent the weekend in a swing state talking to voters. You can too.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 hours ago
  1. You wouldn't want to actually use nuclear weapons
  2. You'd need to actually maintain technical geoengineering for hundreds of thousands of years, eg: for something as long as time time period that modern humans have existed.
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Starting a nuclear war is still likely far worse than even status quo.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 10 hours ago

If you've got 100 amp service, as is typical for US homes, it's in theory possible to do things like set up your EV charger to pause when the dryer or oven is running, and end up without the need for a new breaker box.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

Sure, but the most of the ideas people would be happy about involve keeping the bulk of the human population alive, along with the rest of the ecosystem.

 

changes in population distribution and land use over the 20th century – including forest fragmentation and the conversion of land for urban development and agriculture – have suppressed wildfires, driving down global burned area by 19%.

However, this decline has been hindered by human-caused warming, which has expanded the area burned by 16% through increasingly hot and dry conditions across much of the world.

view more: next ›