Ich hab sie nich geschrieben, nur gegengelesen. Hab dann dummerweise zugegeben, dass sie inhaltlich korrekt ist. Meine Beschwerde zur Form wurde dann mit "Naja, solange der Inhalt passt" beiseite gewischt.
Die nächste gab's dann aber auch in PowerPoint.
Mit Bildern aus Excel.
The ball was a blue pool ball, on a wooden table that I can't describe because I suck at describing things (but I do have a visual of it). I didn't even imagine the person beyond the hand coming up to push it off.
The ball color might have been decided on the moment I read the question, I'm not sure whether it was part of my image before that. Person is still nondescript even after trying to "zoom out". I just can't seem to come up with it.
That they are accompanied by cherublike things - basically battle babies- seems to strike a dischord... Like the narrow space afforded them is big enough to remind them that women have wombs.
Oh damn, I didn't even notice that! Yeah, I can see how that would be reductive. Crazy nuns with babies... hmm. I was mostly asking for material to annoy someone with but this thread actually got me thinking deeply about things.
What a bizarre take.
I didn't push the point, but the impression I got was a watered down version of the "pandering" argument. Like "female characters are pandering to female fans" but instead of complaining about the pandering it was more "I think it's neat they get to have someone to play with too". Not strictly misogynistic, more misguided, does that make sense?
Then again, I can't really speak for how that would actually come across with women.
I remember thinking “oh of course that’s where the women show up and how the toxic portion of the player base acts about them”.
There are also the Banshees! Female-only Eldar warriors, highly mobile, lethal in Melee and with a piercing warcry inducing fear, heralds of doom and grief... I don't quite know how to feel about the fact that the second prominent all-female force is defined by screeching, but like I said, I can't comment on the female PoV.
Part of what I like about Orks is that an all male species is very different from a wildly misogynistic faction.
No gender roles, only Dakka, and if they stare at your chest it's because they're admiring the gun strapped across it.
I can see the appeal.
In fact my guess is that the imperium is probably played way less by women (proportionally to overall player preference) than non-humanoids and non-gendered factions. The imperium feels far more like real and uncomfortable threats than a fungus of war or an invading swarm.
I never really had to think about that, but it makes sense. Personally, I like the Mechanicus where your biology is mostly irrelevant anyway.
I'd assume her staff diligently went over all the repugs talking points, prepared lines of answering, briefed her and generally advised her well, which she converted into a solid delivery. That's the most presidential thing ever: picking competent specialists, trusting them, listening, then packaging the decisions resulting from their expertise in a presentation suitable for the public who generally don't have the time to do all that themselves.
Cyberpunk, but without the cyber and the punk
Not fringe, no.
Definitely cringe tho.
Is a foldable combat knife a good idea? I'd think you'd want the blade to be fixed
Sarcasm so scathing I nearly cut my eye reading it
Thank you for your contribution.
Orks are neat for sure.
(The context of the bet was an acquaintance claiming girls only cared about the Sisters of Battle. I told him he's full of shit, he prompted me for counterexamples and I've been annoying him ever since.)
I keep thinking about the guy complaining that Tom Morello from Rage Against The Machine got political with that one picture of his guitar, and the reddit comment or whatever asking what type of machine he thought the band was raging against - kitchen appliances?
Oh believe me, I would change some things about that database if I could. Alas, I'm just the analyst building data models from it.
(To be fair, it's otherwise easy to work with and for most use-cases, it doesn't matter since they're aggregated per month anyway, so I just load the last month's data on the 2nd of each month. I definitely have worse patients to operate on.)