blightbow

joined 1 year ago
[–] blightbow@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A friend of mine does too.

I'm ready to form a supervillain league with the sole motivation of performing unethical research experiments on your kind. This power must be brought to the masses!

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ok but to balance it: it forces you to confront your own on the topic as well.

I was actually tempted to include that in the original, but I didn't want to belabor it. :)

I'm fine with this, and would prefer it that way.

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 84 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ability to force anyone to objectively confront their own cognitive dissonance by maintaining eye contact.

Possibly too powerful. Some heads may spontaneously combust from a lifetime of preferring their own reality.

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

desperately struggles to maintain character while responding again

turns purple in the face and vanishes in a puff of logic

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I am not an adventurer like you.

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He announced something even better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2y2bIlfbfI

(nsfw)

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's a common feature of any demographic that is convinced of their moral superiority. Once you've accepted that you and your leaders are on the side of justice and are presented a designated enemy, you cease having to look inward. Progress requires acknowledging that you are operating inside of a flawed system, and that you have to work with people from other systems who acknowledge their own flaws.

Tangent: "Enlightened centrists" acknowledge the flaws of both sides of an argument while failing to acknowledge that both sides have to play fair.

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Nah, it's just your addiction to outrage farming on Twitter/Facebook showing. :)

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

14 day old account on its home instance, its only posting activity is within this thread, and both comments are low effort outrage farming with images.

The emotionally evocative hyperbole in the second sentence was pretty good though. Is it your own material? If so, can you write some more persecution porn for us? You don't need images as your crutch, you've got some real writing talent going for you here.

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

A troll is insincere yet playful.

I chuckled at least. A troll's motivation for the rise that they seek is largely inconsequential, as is the delivery mechanism. ;) Let's not go and disenfranchise the majority of the internet's trolling population with narrow typecasting!

While we're on the topic of trolling, are you familiar with Sealioning?

Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity ("I'm just trying to have a debate"), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter. It may take the form of "incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate", and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings. The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki, which The Independent called "the most apt description of Twitter you'll ever see".

It's a rhetorical question, no need to respond. Someone else might learn something they didn't know before today. :)

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Because it’s what we’ve come to expect from large corporations suddenly joining the table of any FOSS project that is adjacent to their financial stakes. Coexistence is possible if they can profit from the software without assimilating it, but it also stands to reason that they will be pushing for new interoperability standards that benefit their own business model at the expense of users in some way.

The lowest hanging fruit would be something that allows them to associate Fediverse accounts with users whose marketing data already exists in their database, or providing a service to third parties that helps them tie their own databases back to Fediverse users. This would require some sort of hook that encourages the users to either associate their Fediverse accounts to an existing Meta service, or otherwise volunteer common PII such as email address that can be cross referenced. Maybe some kind of tracking cookie that accomplishes the same.

Keep in mind that this is just an example, it is not necessarily the exact angle they are pursuing. I’m not in the automatically defederate camp, but a healthy amount of skepticism is definitely warranted.

——

Edit: Also worth a read: https://kbin.social/m/fediverse@lemmy.ml/t/83284/How-to-Kill-a-Decentralised-Network-such-as-the-Fediverse

[–] blightbow@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Giant meteor. It didn’t win the 2020 election but maybe this is a stage it can compete on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›