bignate31

joined 1 year ago
[–] bignate31@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago

It's hype like this that breaks the back of the public when "AI doesn't change anything". Don't get me wrong: AlphaFold has done incredible things. We can now create computational models of proteins in a few hours instead of a decade. But the difference between a computational model and the actual thing is like the difference between a piece of cheese and yellow plastic: they both melt nicely but you'd never want one of them in your quesadilla.

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

next up: "Great thanks we're gonna sell all your photos unless you pay for a subscription. Gotta keep in business somehow!"

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is really great journalism. Someone needs to edit his Wikipedia page and point to this as evidence. Then we can start citing the Wikipedia page to ~~make up~~ discover more of these stories

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 81 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

the real puzzle is wtf happened to the 9th book...

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 10 points 4 weeks ago

oh. go get a therapist--not physical; mental. they're insanely expensive, but you can spend the next three months shopping around and by the new year you'll have found someone you like!

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

you're missing the second "comes"

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

invite me and I'll bring my own alcohol. spread looks delicious!

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Another great example (from DeepMind) is AlphaFold. Because there's relatively little amounts of data on protein structures (only 175k in the PDB), you can't really build a model that requires millions or billions of structures. Coupled with the fact that getting the structure of a new protein in the lab is really hard, and that most proteins are highly synonymous (you share about 60% of your genes with a banana).

So the researchers generated a bunch of "plausible yet never seen in nature" protein structures (that their model thought were high quality) and used them for training.

Granted, even though AlphaFold has made incredible progress, it still hasn't been able to show any biological breakthroughs (e.g. 80% accuracy is much better than the 60% accuracy we were at 10 years ago, but still not nearly where we really need to be).

Image models, on the other hand, are quite sophisticated, and many of them can "beat" humans or look "more natural" than an actual photograph. Trying to eek the final 0.01% out of a 99.9% accurate model is when the model collapse happens--the model starts to learn from the "nearly accurate to the human eye but containing unseen flaws" images.

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

uhhh... Is that "confirmed"? Seems to say "Trump still won't commit" which is substantially different from "Trump won't do it"

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I grew up in Fahren-wasteland, but have lived in Celsi-heaven for 7 years. I embraced it, and now when someone says "40 FUCKING DEGREES!!" I know exactly what they're talking about. It's hot. You probably don't have an air con. It's misery.

[–] bignate31@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I love my ThinkPad, but that's mostly because of the TrackPoint

view more: next ›