TheOakTree

Yes, and Your Grace's (my) pronoun is "Your Grace," also always inflected and conjugated in whichever way is convenient to Your Grace.

You mean to suggest that the first person and third person of your pronouns are conjugated exactly the same. So the sentence "Drag's pronoun is Drag" exists as the first, second, AND third person version of the statement. At that point, what is the point of having distinctions in perspective? It almost seems like your system of pronouns changes the grammar of the language into a different version of the language... hmm...

Oh no, I hurt two dragon-sexuals with one comment! Your argument is stupid. If someone repeatedly injects their foot fetish into unrelated conversations and I write a comment of a similar nature about the foot fetish material, does it really take someone to make me write about it? No, it doesn't, I'm entitled to say what I want about it, and it's reasonable to bring up the issue at hand.

How else do you want me to address it? Jfc.

People who identify as dragons or wolves cause the same kind of harm as "I identify as an attack helicopter" jokes. You are delegitimizing HUMAN gender issues so you can fictionally identify with a fictional creature.

Every time I see you refer to yourself that way, I want to gouge my eyes out.

Firstly, we don't consent to engaging with your dragon kink. I've seen your comments that reaffirm that this is the core of your 'identity'. Your screen name is another clear example. Leave us out of this "Dragon Rider" nonsense - I don't care what your kinks are, keep it private without consent.

Second, why do you still use third person perspective here? Your bio clearly states that "Drag" works in the first, second, and third person, so why leave it in third person instead of speaking about yourself in first person? You are writing in english, right? Or is this Dragspeak/Dragtongue/[some other fantasy bullshit]?

If you're going to make up rules, put on an act, then submit everyone else to it, at least try thinking through it for longer than a few seconds. I get the feeling you never properly considered how poorly "Drag" works in first person. "Drag keep Dragself happy by exposing unconsenting strangers to Drag own dragon kinks!" Perhaps that's part of it: adopting a lizard's attention span.

Germanium My Ass

Has paragraph sense, when you press it it have a "kacakaca" sound

Next you'll tell me when rolling character attributes you roll 5d6 and discard the lowest 2.

If you found this in the rulebook for any TTRPG, then yes, it would make sense to follow the rules within that game.

Advantage/disadvantage is very explicitly defined in the rules of D&D.

Would you say the amount you received in thanks is roughly worth the amount of work you did by marketing and relaying feedback? I'm just curious.

I think it's a genius solution to the explicit problem, but a terrible solution in a larger scope. There are many animals that feed on mosquitos, and they would suffer from massive decreases in mosquito population. This includes birds, frogs, bats, fish, and other insects (many aquatic animals eat mosquito larvae). I would hate to see a cascading reduction in animal populations as a result of these tactics.

The idea is to introduce this genetic expression into wild mosquito populations. That way, the inevitable act of mosquito reproduction lowers the next generation's reproduction rate.

Starfish is a sphere?

Nothing quite like some pickled daikon...