Sodium_nitride

joined 11 months ago
[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wholesome message. I will now follow my dreams and burn down the local orphanage.

Jokes aside, you are completely right about

Community isn’t formed by just sitting around hoping it into existence it’s formed by doing the things you want to do and doing it with others

And people should internalise this as much as possible. I myself have gotten stuck in the mindset many times in the past of waiting to just stumble upon a community and/or friends before I will become happy. Took a lot of growth on my part to realise that I would have to make an effort myself (especially since I hate making effort).

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I suspect economic pragmatism will win in the end.

As much as I would like to say that it will, I am not really hopeful in this regard. I'm Indian so I know many Indians. I can tell you that sinophobia and islamophobia has become a huge problem. A racist bourgeoisie ruled government should never be thought of as a reliable long-term partner. It is only a matter of time before they pull something stupid.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I wouldn't be so sure. I don't think a total war over these territories is likely, but there have been instances in the past of the situation escalating severely between India and China. Even though a lot of the fighting over the territories is symbolic, nationalism is a volatile thing. You never know when the border issues are used as a justification for bigger military action, especially at the urging of the US.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

Let's hope that sooner rather than later, the border issues can be permanently resolved. Hot war between China and India would be catastrophic.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No idea why the numbers are so different. The numbers I found were 120 GWh (not MWh, it was a typo). But that is still significantly less than the us doe estimate.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

For reference, cuba's energy consumption is about 120 ~~MWh~~ GWh per year

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For Michael Christensen, Heliospect’s Danish CEO and a former financial markets trader, genetic selection promises a bright future. “Everyone can have all the children they want and they can have children that are basically disease-free, smart, healthy; it’s going to be great,” he boasted during a video call in November 2023.

Kid named microplastics

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 4 days ago

These people should pursue their dreams of becoming comedians instead of wasting away editing Wikipedia articles. I believe in them.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Is there any benefit to supersizing wind turbines? Is it more cost effective, or is the main benefit the reduced land use?

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Even if all of this spying activity was real (there is a 0% chance that more than 10% of it is), the American government certainly deserves to be spied upon. Hell, even the article claims

China also purged a whole cadre of officials working as U.S. spies a decade ago.

Further fueling paranoia were allegations by former U.S. intelligence contractor. Edward Snowden that the U.S. had extensively hacked Chinese infrastructure including mobile phone networks.

You spy on a country the country spies back at you. Seems fair, no?

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I mean this one could actually be at a big cost. It would take a lot of effort to switch the world's digital systems to be fully quantum secure, but this situation was inevitable either way.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 days ago

The whole transition from pre-capitalist modes of production (whatever they may have been) to the capitalist mode of production happened because of the mechanization of agriculture and textile making. These lowered the value of labor-power (which is the cost of reproduction workers, the 2 biggest ones being food and clothing) and allowed for the generation of massive amounts of surplus value on a historical scale. Wherever the mechanization of agriculture and textiles occurred, the capitalists gained power over the other proprietor classes. They leveraged this power to further expand the mechanization of agriculture, and thus the capitalist mode of production wherever they could.

In fact, this process of expanding capitalism still is ongoing today. There are something like 2 billion "small holding farmers who interact with the market to some extent, but are not practicing capitalist farming (socialized, mechanized commodity farming). This is why capitalism today, which has assumed a world dimension has still not run into its final limits

 
 

Just a quick shower thought (I am literally typing this in the shower)

I think it might hit closer to home, because the insult (accusing someone of being loyal to the empire) is less abstract than insulting someone for having an unscientific world-view. Another benefit is that it makes us seem less like conservatives, and is harder to coopt by patsocs.

Obviously, the insult will probably only become effective if it spreads so that people know what is being referred to. And obviously, liberalism is still a menace.

What do you guys think?

 

I was originally skeptical when they introduced genocide Joe as the new jojo (name doesn't even make sense, how is GEJO the same as JOJO) because I thought that an 80 year old man wouldn't be relatable or entertaining.

Turns out, that's the least of his problems.

 

Don't know if I am preaching to the choir, but with how much libs try to use the trolley problem to support their favorite war criminal, it got me thinking just how cringe utilitarianism is.

Whatever utilitarianism may be in theory, in practice, it just trains people to think like bureaucrats who belive themselves to be impartial observers of society (not true), holding power over the lives of others for the sake of the common good. It's imo a perfect distillation of bourgeois ideology into a theory of ethics. It's a theory of ethics from the pov of a statesman or a capitalist. Only those groups of people have the power and information necessary to actually act in a meaningfully utilitarian manner.

It's also note worthy just how prone to creating false dichotomies and ignoring historical context utilitarians are. Although this might just be the result of the trolley problem being so popular.

 

I don't know how the fuck this shit started, but I've started to see more and more comparisons between Biden and Lincoln amongst libs for the purposes of vote shaming.

Like these mfs apparently don't realise that Lincoln sided with the abolitionists (in the end) while Biden would be a slave owner in their own analogy!

 

The election discourse has become cancerous because it keeps going in circles. This is because liberals have become fixated on the narrative of there being some large bloc of leftists who are going around trying to convince people to not vote. However, this contingent, does not actually exist? Most of the people I have seen take a stance against voting for Biden aren't telling other people to not vote. Some are, but the number of these people is so vanishingly small (compared to the rest of the electorate) that it becomes clear that the election discourse is entirely a waste of time.

Liberals are also really trying hard to convince these people to vote (by berating them online), and it just seems like this is the most idiotic and time wasting strategy possible. These people have negative charisma.

Even if they actually could actually speak persuasively, wouldn't it be far better to target the large number of non-voting centrists/apathetic people rather than leftists who have taken a principled stance (and thus could only be convinced if you knew more about American and world history, which liberals are blissfully unaware of)?

For as much as liberals are fond of accusing leftists of being impotents on a moral high horse, the election memers aren't accomplishing anything either.

 

I finally managed to convince my lib friend to accept that he may be wrong about tibet (he thinks that the chinese settler colonised tibet), and that I should give him some sources for reading and for him to make up his mind.

However, I don't really know where to start in finding good quality sources that he will trust (he is very distrustful of Chinese sources). Does anybody know any good sources I can use? Our argument revolves around 2 main points

  1. China did not conduct a genocide in tibet
  2. Tibet was a feudal theocratic society before its liberation.

Much appreciated.

 

Archive link

Key information:

South Korea will spend the money to build 13 new chip plants and three research facilities, on top of an existing 21 fabs. Spanning Pyeongtaek to Yongin, the area is expected to be the largest in the world, capable of producing 7.7 million wafers monthly by 2030.

As part of the two-decade plan, Samsung and Hynix are set to build their most sophisticated chip plants at home. Samsung’s betting big on foundry – or making chips for other firms – as part of a 500 trillion won investment by 2047. Smaller rival Hynix aims to invest 122 trillion won in memory in Yongin over the same period.

The government said the region will also house smaller chip design and materials companies. The overarching ambition is to improve the country’s self-sufficiency in semiconductors, while increasing its market share of global logic chip production to 10 per cent by 2030 from 3 per cent now.

?Pangyo, where fabless firms are now concentrated, will be the hub of low-powered, high-performance AI chips. Suwon will be a central test bed for compound semiconductors, while Pyeongtaek will see a new semiconductor R&D centre at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology’s new campus to be completed by 2029.

Some more information on compound semiconductors

Additional details

 

The other day, I was arguing with someone israel and Palestine, and they brought up the whole "everybody has done settler colonialism before" trope. While it's an idiotic argument even if true (directly contradicting their whole "rules based international order" sthick), it did get me wondering.

I've assumed up until now that settler colonialism is a phenomena unique to the capitalist phase of history, but how true is that exactly?

view more: next ›