Ptsf

joined 8 months ago
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That doesn't make sense. Every alkaline cell suffers from this due to the formation of hydrogen gas inside the cell over its lifespan, as well as corrison caused by the chemistry of the cells themselves. It's not specifically driven by the charge of the cell; although that is certainly a contributing factor and poorly designed circuits will exhibit more wear on the cell causing more rapid corrison & gas formation.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 161 points 1 week ago (28 children)

Isn't it all unicode at the end of the day, so it supports anything unicode supports? Or am I off base?

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Less dangerous in the box. Box is shelter from the storm. Well. Not Milton, but smaller storms, surely?

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"I could have said, β€˜drop to your knees and beg,’ and he would have done it" -Trump on Elon in 2022

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

You literally cannot mess with your emissions system legally.... nor can you disable or modify certain safety systems (seat belts, etc). Software that goes into vehicles requires validation testing. You might be fine doing 1 off things, but there will never be a "flash able" car on the market that let's you bring your own software, and honestly I'm good with that. I don't need your massive multiple ton machine bluescreening down the highway or locking up the breaks randomly because you installed the wrong module.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I later did ask it to just be helpful, specifically requesting it give me some possible words that fit for the 5 letter possibility for #1. It repeated "floor it" lol.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not great, honestly.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Also never ask it to solve a picture of a crossword.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

That'll literally never happen due to testing and safety requirements.

[–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fingerprints are fake science and not really admissible in court these days. You actually do share your fingerprint with other humans, at least on the scales we can measure it, and thus it's unreliable. The only reason it works for phones/etc is that a 1 in 50,000 false positive rate is "good enough".

https://www.bu.edu/sjmag/scimag2005/opinion/fingerprints.htm#:~:text=Critics%20like%20Simon%20Cole%2C%20a,a%20troubling%20pattern%20of%20errors.

view more: next β€Ί