LongerDonger

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does the homeserver we sign up with matter? I'd rather not have my account nuked for saying "loli".

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This community doesn't allow AI art, but I think this post would fit perfectly in !lewd_ai.

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I've seen the farming one already! The way Ru ends up kinda confuses me, but I tend not to pay too much mind to plot holes in "okay" shows anyway. Overall I think it's just a nice comfy one.

As for Isekai Ojisan, I haven't heard of it but it sounds exactly like the kind of thing I'm looking for, so I'll give it a shot!

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 3 points 10 months ago

I think so, but all the stuff posted prior to the ban is still available.

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I haven't seen lolibooru.moe mentioned yet.

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is this community limited only to lewd images or are AI chatlogs allowed too? I previously told someone I'd post one of mine but I don't have anywhere to put it since that post has now been deleted. Is that allowed here or should it be somewhere else?

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 1 points 11 months ago

Preferably anime, but if you have good suggestions that fit the other categories then go for it!

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 2 points 11 months ago

If you want the angle brackets to appear, you can't put your prompt in a code block. It's a Lemmy bug.

 

I'm back into my habit of binging trashy isekai anime for a while to cleanse my palate in preparation for something good. Yes, I am aware this is stupid.

What would you (not) recommend? I'm looking for something passable but not that good. In more concrete terms, around a 5-6/10.

Please nothing as bad as Gin no Guardian (shudder). Never again.

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 2 points 11 months ago

Magenta. It's fake. Not real. A phoney.

It's a combination of two colors masquerading as a real colour. If we ignore the fact that pretty much all screens display combinations of only 3 colors, magenta is the only "color" that does not appear on the visual spectrum. This is because it is actually an illusion in our minds produced by wavelengths on both ends of the visible spectrum.

It's a fraud and I won't have it.

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 2 points 11 months ago

I wish I could get gens with witty text. For now I have to rely on my own grey matter!

[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LongerDonger@burggit.moe 3 points 1 year ago

The player could describe what they saw, but nobody except the GM knows if it's true.

It's equally plausible that the paladin failed the check and saw a monster when there was only a dog, or that they passed the check and saw a monster because there was in fact a monster. Their argument to the party would be the same in either case: "that's no dog, it's a ~~space station~~ monster".

The party then must question who saw the correct thing. Did the paladin actually see something everyone else missed? Or are they just seeing things? My point was that the players should not immediately be able to discern the truth. I find that this kind of uncertainty breeds intrigue!

view more: next ›