BestBouclettes

joined 1 year ago
[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 17 hours ago

Ah, au temps pour moi, j'avais pas fait gaffe à ça :)

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 3 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Perso je n'étais pas spécialement pour défédérer Hexbear, je les vois comme des trolls à la 4Chan et considère leur contenu comme tel.

Par contre, la vague de brigading sur le post original était particulièrement violente et maintenant, c'est possible qu'on soit un peu dans leur viseur (au moins pour un temps). Ce qui signifie qu'on risque de voir de nouvelles attaques du style. Et tolérer l'intolérance c'est risqué.

Hexbear est problématique et on serait pas les premiers à les défédérer.
Pour Lemmygrad je pense qu'on peut les laisser tant qu'il n'y a pas d'attaque directe de leur part.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd not be surprised if these attacks were linked to the recent lawsuits IA had to go through concerning copyright and such...

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Obviously it's a very complex and complicated situation that would take multiple books to expose and explain entirely.
And obviously if we were to dismantle this system overnight it would wreak havoc on societies and people.
Your example of locally vs chinese manufactured products is one of many examples of the oppressive systems we have in place.

Say you have a factory in your hometown that produces X and employs 1000 people. And because of political choices, and search for more profits, the owner of the factory decides to relocate to China.
Why China? Because of more lenient work regulation and human rights protection, the cost of labour is cheaper. At least it used to be, given that it changed a bit in recent years.

So the factory in your hometown closes, 1000 people are now filing for unemployment. And 1000 people across the globe are now employed in the new factory, for less pay and probably rough working conditions. They manufacture the same product for cheaper, but that product is still sold for the same price in your home country, or is slightly more expensive (to cover the cost of relocation and shipping for instance).
The owner now takes a bigger margin, 1000 people are unemployed and need to find another job and 1000 Chinese people work in the factory (usually in terrible conditions). With that, you just displaced the potential unrest of people wanting higher pay or better working conditions.

The people in your hometown now have to rely on social security nets not to starve because of slashed revenue, especially if the factory was the main employment source in the region. The people in China now have a job but one that will probably fuck up their health and with enough time, they will manage to ask for better working conditions. If they get them and the cost of labour gets too high for the owner, the cycle repeats in another country, let's say Kenya.

In the meantime, the owner is probably friends with other people like him, most of them having ties to people with political power or influence. Where they can do similar things to your public services, healthcare, education system, etc.These people control most of the narrative via media ownership, so they can steer public opinion away from their actions.

In countries with a colonial past, these people also use their country's influence to impose their will on locals.
Like bribing the current government to build a pipeline through the country, or fuelling unrest, or arming militias to overthrow a government that doesn't play well with their plans.

All that to get cheaper materials or cheaper labour to manufacture abroad what used to be manufactured in your hometown. But now the product is more expensive, usually of worse quality and you can't afford it anymore because you lost your job, because a guy wanted more zeros on his spreadsheet.

Obviously this is simplified and lacks nuance, but that's roughly how all of these systems play together and end up being oppressive either in your country or across the world.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're not the one doing the oppression but everything we consume and many things we can and can't do all stem from oppressive systems.
Like exploitation of the global South, exploitation from billionaires, the consequences of colonialism, bashing minorities and migrants, religious oppression, etc.
Our first world living standards are all built on the remnants and on current oppressive systems.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu -1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And energy dense too!
It also requires a literal village to run and maintain.
And that's the problem, I don't want to see a nuclear power plant managed by fucking Amazon or Google.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Yeah, I believe that too. As an actual proportion of all living people, actually (as in from birth, with a pathological lack of empathy or similar) bad people are most likely a very thin minority.
The rest come from nurturing (friends, family, economic situation), political choices (affordable healthcare, housing, food safety), and bad luck.
We are also gullible and ignorant most of the time, which probably doesn't help either.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 2 points 5 days ago

More like before their infinite chase for growth and cost cutting causes a nuclear incident. I'm pro nuclear but that's just a catastrophe waiting to happen.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's probably both

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 109 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They're sanewashing him more than anything

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 83 points 6 days ago

Supply side Jesus!

 
 
 

En voyant cette affaire remonter, je suis sérieusement en train de me poser la question sur l'issue des élections législatives.

On a entendu parler de la victoire du RN à l'assemblée pour montrer à la population à quel point ils sont incompétents, ce qui entraînera leur défaite aux présidentielles de 2027.

Avec l'affaire des dîners, est ce qu'on ne serait pas en réalité dans ce genre de scénario mais avec le NFP plutôt que le RN ?

Pour l'instant, on a un président qui refuse de reconnaître la victoire (même si elle est mineure) du NFP, une coalition qui ne se fera probablement pas, un gouvernement pas encore formé et un premier ministre à qui on a refusé la démission.

Le même président qui dîne (lui ou ses laquais, pas vraiment de différence) chez un bourgeois fraudeur multi récidiviste, avec des membres de la droite et de l'extrême droite, pour apparemment, "faire connaissance".

Avec la machine de propagande bourgeoise qu'on a pu voir en action, toutes ces choses-là vont être récupérées et utilisées contre la gauche à un moment donné.

Si le bilan du NFP est mitigé, soit par une éventuelle incompétence, soit par les bâtons dans les roues qu'ils auront pris, en 2027, leurs chances de remporter les élections seront très probablement nulles.

Est ce que je fais de la paranoïa ou ce scénario semble plausible ?

 
295
Smol (jlai.lu)
 
 
212
Mlem (jlai.lu)
 
302
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by BestBouclettes@jlai.lu to c/cat@lemmy.world
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›