this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
731 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

58859 readers
4871 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1lya@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Using Threema is not an option. This is paid software and it is too difficult to purchase a license for this software when Google does not allow us to pay for purchases through their Android app store. No one from my entourage will bother paying for a license for this software using cryptocurrency. They will just install another messenger.

[–] narrowide96lochkreis@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Know many people who bought Threema on Google Play

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is what I hate most about the privacy community, too fanatical and purist to allow extremely useful optional features that would allow them to reach more people.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I use Signal whenever I can because I'm not comfortable with Meta harvesting metadata of my conversations with people. guess what would happen if Signal made it possible to talk to Whatsapp accounts?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

Honestly would love to use signal to chat with my whatsapp contacts. Signal could just throw in privacy notice when messaging with someone whatsapp or facebook messenger.

Currently I have signal installed and used to use it to message with my so but we have both moved to discord and use whatsapp to communicate with those that do not use discord. Still holding on to signal if and when some oddball from my contacts decides to use it instead.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] THE_MASTERMIND 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Threema seems to solve a problem signal has that is it does'nt need a phone number to open account . But i haven't used any of them so can't say . (If anyone wanna know i use telgram foss which is a debloated fork of the original client)

[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Doesn't signal now have username support? I thought i saw it released a week or so ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

or even a Matrix service would mean a deterioration of our data protection standards

Why? They use same algos, same scheme. Just add support for matrix message format in your app.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

WhatsApp is closed source, and obviously it must be able to decrypt messages for the end user to read them. Anything could happen to the unencrypted data at this point. Therefore it's less secure allowing conversations to flow into that app.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Re-read my comment please. I'm talking about Matrix, not whatsapp. Not downvoting because you are correct, but it is out of context.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Me neither lol

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Both Signal and Threema can now theoretically ask Meta to open access for basic messaging interoperability

Why is it a one-way thing? Would Meta ever be in a position to force Signal to interoperate?

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Maybe eventually, it has to do with market share and if the service is a "core platform". Signal doesn't have enough market share to warrant it yet, even iMessage wasn't forced to since it's not that popular in EU. The law was mainly targeted at WhatsApp as that's THE messenger in the EU.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›