this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
238 points (92.8% liked)

tumblr

3351 readers
569 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

I do listen to "both" sides! That's exactly why I'm a leftist!

I don't get why centrists think that you have to be "centrist" to listen to both sides, or why doing so makes you a centrist.

[–] Mrderisant@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

For America I'm what used to be a centrist, but now unfortunately I would be considered far left. I hate what we have become. Vote blue!

Green is better but not enough people even know about the Green party that it would be viable

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

The Greens are horrible on their own merits. Any third party in the US needs to start out saying the voting system must be changed. If they don't, that's a good sign they're a combination of a grift and useful idiots. The Greens rarely talk about it unless someone else brings it up first, and they quickly try to change the subject after mumbling a few things about it.

Another sign is that they don't try to build up support over time from local and state races. Greens occasionally run candidates for state congress, but for the most part, they show up for a Presidential run every 4 years and disappear.

Their historical anti-nuclear stance has exasperated climate change. They held back something that would have been very useful to mass deploy 20-30 years ago (although I do think the economics have changed, and it's no longer the right option for new rollouts). The German wing of the party is currently cheering on the dismantling of perfectly good nuclear reactors in exchange for much, much dirtier sources.

Nader's campaign in 2000 absolutely did torpedo Al Gore (and no, you don't have to convert every Nader voter in Florida to Gore for this to be true). He kept power out of the hands of one of the most genuine public servants to run in recent history, and gave power to a trainwreck of an administration that was 180 degrees away from their stated goals.

Greens need to get serious or fuck off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rosymind@leminal.space 3 points 11 months ago

I think it's a difference in how we define words. If we focus on our common ground, first, then we are more likely to listen to each other. To a person who identifies as centrist, a person who calls themselves liberal might appear to be on the fringe of society IF the so-called centrist (who may even actually be liberal) is within a community where they are surrounded by more conservative voices.

Being with my husband has taught me that how we individually define words matters a lot more than we think. He and I grew up in very different circumstances and will often argue different points and then get extremely frustrated at each other for not understanding what we mean. Sometimes I'm thinking "what is he saying, that has nothing to do with what I'm talking about" only to realize that the way he defines a word, phrase, or idea is completely different to my definition.

If you want someone to truly listen to you, you first have to be open to discovering what's important to them and how they are expressing it

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 13 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Dude that's not LEFT. they made us believe that. It's just common sense

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Reality has a "left wing" bias.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Here is the thing: always listening to both sides of the argument is a good policy, but remember that you are under no obligation to agree with both sides. Yes, on some issues both sides have valid points, but on other issues one side is completely bogus and once you realize it you should not pretend that it isn't.

[–] 31415926535@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (13 children)

Past week, been seeing a lot of anti liberal stuff on lemmy. So, you've got people from the outside trying to destabilize the u.s. saying, both sides are the same, democrats are just as bad as Republicans. This creates a scenario that created Trump becoming president in the 1st place. It's done on purpose.

Now, I understand that democrats, liberals aren't perfect. But we have one side trying to set up detention camps, threatening to kill political rivals, consumed with hate. Other side trying at least to be better people.

I'm asking honestly, I would like to learn. Why is the both sides mindset becoming so prevalent?

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 4 points 11 months ago

Both sides ARE bad, but one side is blatantly evil. I was hoping that rise of the internet would make more people aware of it, but somehow it got worse. After 2004 election, I was convinced that the voters will start making a more informed decision, but 2016 proved me wrong.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why is the both sides mindset becoming so prevalent?

Liberalism is used, cynically (imo), as a cudgel, to vote against real progressive politics. We can't have healthcare-for-all because we have to pick the side that isn't insane or else we get the insane group. And so on, and so on…

Look at how the Biden admin endorses genocide in Gaza. They completely ignore the masses of protesters calling for a ceasefire. How can they get away with this? "The other side is worse."

A truly responsive party would not stick its thumb in the eye of the people. It's not that both sides are equally awful. It's that both are awful and one uses the other to retain power.

[–] Vespair@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Yes but the problem is despite all their blustering online, people only actually engage at the endgame stage of politics. All these "ideologically pure" leftists are doing jackshit to either ensure progressive leftist ideals win out over liberal ideals in the currently viable sorta left-presenting party or to support independent leftist political parties and groups in down-ballot, local elections, and community policy projects. No, instead these oh-so-great morally-superior "real leftists" instead want to bitch and moan about futility and then opt-out on big voting day while spouting virtues as if their behavior doesn't prevent real progressive change for the better, incremental though it may be.

And to very clear, I'm not taking the "fall in line or get out of the way" democrat bullshit stance here. If you really believe in the policy and values of a third party, please vote for them. I will never accuse an involved voter of throwing a vote away. I'm specifically talking about the large chunk of the left who are only left in theory, not practice, the ideological cosplayers who pretend anything less than absolute is not worth fighting for but who don't put in any effort to ensure that what they want even ever has a chance of ending up on the ballot in front of them.

It's easy to stand on virtue and say you won't support the lesser of two evils, but unless you're actively working on an alternative, the simple fact is that your abstained position enables the worst-case scenario which will have real-world impact. If we believe in leftist ideals, we should believe in reasonable harm reduction where possible. Same applies here.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Terevos@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Let's be more honest. Both sides are horrible.

Yes, one side is "trying to set up detention camps, threatening to kill political rivals, consumed with hate". The other side isn't trying to better people. The vast majority (there are a handful of exceptions) of people in politics are trying to gain power and money for themselves and for their friends.

The biggest difference is that they haven't yet crossed the line into actively trying to destroy our democracy.

That's certainly enough reason to support that side over the other one. But it's not the "good side".

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago

Bunch of career politician parasites the lot of them.

Their only interest is in getting re-elected. If it can't be fixed in four years, it won't get done because it's the next guy's problem.

[–] Mrderisant@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

People who are either trying to help shift the window further right, or fucking morons who are fascist apologists

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (8 children)

There are no centrists when one side is fascism.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] TheBlue22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I got into leftism BECAUSE I listened to both sides of the spectrum (i used to be a right winger) not in spite of it

[–] darq@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm a leftist precisely because I started paying more attention and listening to both sides.

I was a centrist before I started doing that.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 11 months ago

I thought I was a centrist, because it was clear to me that both sides are terrible, and going to kill us all.

Turns out I was just a leftist all along

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

I was a leftist because my parents weren't and I was a rebel.

I eventually grew up and thought 'this is fucking awesome' and kept going.

[–] OctopusKurwa@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

If you are paying attention and you have a drop of empathy then you're almost guaranteed to be one.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

tbf to centrists at least they aren't convinced they are right about everything. People with strong views get blinded by their ideology.

[–] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's been easier to debate and change every centrist or independent I've ever known than anyone who applied left or right wing labels to themselves, that's for damn sure.

[–] steeznson@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I'm extremely keen on politics but have been a paid up member of the third party in the UK. Kind of centrists who have liberal social views. Get so much stick from friends and family for getting involved in politics to come sit on the fence! They never win anything but function a bit like a policy think tank where they adopt progressive policies before anyone else does then one of the larger parties steal their ideas.

IMO most issues have nuance and need to be considered in isolation on their own merits.

[–] darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Literally arguing for a middle ground between correct and incorrect because they reflexively have to make themselves look like the reasonable center whenever the left/right dynamic comes up on the internet.

No thought into the response it's just Pavlovian centrist drooling.

[–] JVT038@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

Not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet, but it reminds me of Kassandra who was cursed by Apollo and destined to tell everyone true prophesies, but nobody would ever believe her.

She foresaw the fall of Troy and tried to warn everyone, but was ignored and forced to watch the city's downfall.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Theory: they know. They know we're in trouble, that we need to take action, that we can fix the problems. They know that they're wrong and that they're making things worse, but they don't care about being right or making the word better, they only care about winning. To change is to admit defeat and, therefore, lose, so the only way to win is to make sure that your opponents lose too.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In 2020 as we contemplated our second week of lockdown I made the following predictions:

  • Lockdowns will go on far, far longer than two weeks
  • It will result in enormous economic disruption
  • While will trigger WW3

Boy does that also suck. Good thing we don’t have any centrists though.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 11 months ago

I don't understand your point. Neither of those points are left or right. And the third one didn't even happened.

load more comments
view more: next ›