Politics

281 readers

63 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

Supreme Court declines to hear challenge of the Consumer Product Safety Commission’s structure (www.cnn.com)

submitted 14 hours ago by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/politics@sh.itjust.works

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The appeal from two “educational organizations,” alleged that the 52-year-old independent consumer protection agency violates the Constitution because its five-member board can only be removed by the president for cause.

A federal appeals court had ruled against the groups and so the Supreme Court’s decision to deny the case leaves the agency’s structure in place.

The case is the latest stop in a years-long legal battle over independent agencies Congress creates and attempts to insulate from politics and the whims of a president. Critics say those independent agencies, whose boards cannot be easily removed, raise significant separation of powers concerns.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission can “ban products, file enforcement suits, and secure eight-figure penalties,” the groups told the Supreme Court. “But it does all of this outside the lines of political accountability.”

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

What is going on right now? Does the SJC suddenly feel the need to play both sides of the field? (I may have the wrong metaphor. I apologize.)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

I'm not sure if it's clear, but they are trying to keep it so the president has the power to fire anyone they want and congress hires them. We've seen how that can go when certain presidents have control of the congress as well.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

This is consistent with conservatives gutting other regulators that exist to protect the public from corporate exploitation.