this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
778 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19087 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Am I being too optimistic in seeing this as an opportunity? Surely even MAGA-women object to someone being called a whore just because she’s successful? Surely even MAGA-women have limits to being treated as second class citizens? Surely even MAGA-women can connect that with old white men controlling their reproductive process and see the slippery slope they’re already flying down?

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Never let yourself become convinced that conservatives will vote in their best interest. They aren't voting based on some logical paradigm, some set of criteria--they are voting on their emotions and their emotions are based on symbols. It's why the people who claim to be so proud of their Constitution know absolutely nothing about it.

[–] minyakcurry@monyet.cc 6 points 3 months ago

The other replies are much more reactive, which I totally get given the discourse. I'd recommend a book called "Right Wing Women" by Dworkin to further explore this idea.

These MAGA women are likely trapped in their own belief, because their sense of self comes from the man that constantly dehumanizes them. If you escape, you are left with nothing (since that's what you have been indoctrinated to believe in). The only "out" is to be a good trad girl, and hope that the men praise you -- this is the only possible source of self-worth.

Not saying that this excuses their behaviour, but I hope this provides an additional layer of complexity rather than "MAGA women bad".

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Maga-women have no principles, as is the case with most republicans

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] don@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait. So you’re telling me that water, when applied to most things, tends to make those things… wet?!

ffs what next? Bears that live in the woods often shit in the woods? Many species of birds are known for their ability to fly?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 months ago

well when your entire campaign strategy revolves around making absolutely sure that turnout is so low you get in by default, what did you expect

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Very disgusting.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

So they're saying Trump would sleep with her? Yeah I guess that's pretty insulting

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Descends?

Displays…

This is always who they were.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago
[–] bquintb@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

yes! please keep doing this Republicans.....and louder, so that everyone can hear in the back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s going to get so much worse. “Joe and his ho” and “Kameltoe Harris” were very common things I’ve heard in the south.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Surprising nobody

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

At least they are finally being honest about what they are.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 months ago

Sigh. My state sucks.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›